"...spirit complex, though apparent rather than real...having existed potentially"

[Parsons]

You are taking micro-quotes out of the context in which they were asked. Here is what Ra was describing:

79.20 ▶ Questioner: I would like to try and understand the archetypes of the mind of this Logos prior to the extension of the first distortion. In order to better understand that which we experience now I believe that this is a logical approach.

I think you are coming to wildly different conclusions about the nature of the Mind is you are losing sight of the forest through the trees. You are approaching this from an extremely subjective viewpoint where you have decided you are already "correct" (confirmation bias) before engaging in a conversation where you are supposedly trying to gain new ideas. Your mind seems to be completely closed. So this thread is just preaching your dogma and you have no interest in an actual discussion. This is evidenced by you repeating the same out-of-context micro-quote over and over again in super large print. This is equivalent to screaming the same phrase over and over again in a formal debate. Also you have ignored extremely good points that were made (such as Ra using different terminology for certain words such as 'Galaxy').