07-23-2014, 12:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2014, 01:03 AM by Adonai One.)
(07-23-2014, 12:53 AM)anagogy Wrote: Where in the material does it say that thought is only produced by mind?
Assumption.
Where in the material does it say that 1 = 1? One could equal two and The Law of One could be The Law of Two.
This is not about the material's content itself anymore. It's about what the material directly says through the English language and its use of it. Edit: It's about using the proper, agreed definitions of the words at hand. We either say Ra is competent and use words as they are intended or is speaking in mystic garble that can be interpreted every which way.
There are only so many ways to define "Thought" and to define it beyond the confines of the mind is to pretty much take the standard English vocabulary and say it no longer applies. We might as well all talk in word salad indian virtue guinea pig is alive intelligence....