07-17-2014, 05:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-17-2014, 06:19 PM by JustLikeYou.)
(Moved here from a different thread.)
Although numbered 1-22 and given linear positions in cycles of 7, the archetypes are not to be thought of as a sequence. They have interlocking parts which fit together in a complex, multi-dimensional way. Suggesting that the potentiator comes last or the significator first is analogous to suggesting that the steering wheel belongs in front of the engine. It fails to appreciate that the system is not linear. The delivery of the system in a linear fashion is a matter of convenience. While one may trace, flow-chart style, paths of energy flow in a car, it is not accurate to say that any one part comes "first" without explaining what you mean by "first". First from the persepective of the driver as a cause? First in the car's electrical circuit? First in the flow of gasoline? First in order of importance?
Although numbered 1-22 and given linear positions in cycles of 7, the archetypes are not to be thought of as a sequence. They have interlocking parts which fit together in a complex, multi-dimensional way. Suggesting that the potentiator comes last or the significator first is analogous to suggesting that the steering wheel belongs in front of the engine. It fails to appreciate that the system is not linear. The delivery of the system in a linear fashion is a matter of convenience. While one may trace, flow-chart style, paths of energy flow in a car, it is not accurate to say that any one part comes "first" without explaining what you mean by "first". First from the persepective of the driver as a cause? First in the car's electrical circuit? First in the flow of gasoline? First in order of importance?