06-23-2010, 01:05 PM
(06-23-2010, 11:58 AM)unity100 Wrote: lets approach it from higher above, and come down towards our density ;
there are innumerable principles or higher density entities that are overseeing many things. ranging from devas to entities higher selves to local logoi to heaven knows what else galactic or even universal entities and principles and groups.
even as of now, there are happening many acts of violence. an entity is beating his wife, according to a life plan/pattern laid out by its higher self. (or himself too, if the entity is advanced enough). another entity is as of now killing someone, either in defense or with foul intent, by using his body. principles or entities or elements overseeing the functioning of body complexes are allowing the body to lift the arm and shoot another body dead. some groups in some social constructs around the world are killing and executing some other groups within or outside themselves. local logos is allowing these to happen. despite the fact that it, or similar larger entities or groups in higher densities can stop any of these events. actually, these are happening according to the plans the logos and higher entities laid out. leave all these aside, the entities that are performing the lifetaker duty are taking the lives of countless entities around the galaxy.
are they functioning without love ? are they being violent ?
Thank you for your thoughts on the matter, Unity100, I will contemplate them further today.
However.....at first glance, I don't really see the connection between these ideas you have written and my request for an interpretation of that specific Ra quote -- where Ra seemed to be advising Wanderers against Karmic entanglement and then explaining that one can become karmically involved by acting in a consciously unloving fashion in concert with other beings. That little section in and of itself seems to imply, to me at least, that participation in armed conflict is not advisable for a Wanderer. It also seems to imply, (again, to me) that conversely ACTING in a consciously LOVING fashion is recommended for Wanderers.
Admittedly, sometimes topics like this take a while for me to digest, so I will give it some more thought and re-read your post later today to see if that helps. I confess I am pretty firmly in the camp that Love is the appropriate response for Wanderers in a 3D body and positively polarizing 3D souls alike. That said, I have resonated with some of the concepts you have described in earlier posts and am open to expanding my mind on this topic. Frankly, I'm not sure about my own Wanderer status (Maybe so, maybe not, I don't know). But I have long had a fundamental assumption that the answer to that question doesn't really matter because the mission of a Wanderer here is to help raise the consciousness and help others polarize positively (as a magnet impacts unpolarized iron)... and the mission of a 3D soul getting ready to graduate is to polarize positively and lift their consciousness. That made the "Am I, Am I not?" question become totally academic. However, the heart of your proposal seems to be that there is a different standard or set of behaviors/ethics that is distinct for Wanderers. Indeed that Wanderers should focus on things beyond purely Love and positive polarity. Now, I don't mean to put words in your mouth, that is merely my interpretation of what I have heard you say recently.
Thanks again for sharing your perspective, brother.
P.S. Though it is not my place to comment at length, I believe Gary gave you some very good advice on style and approach. I recently participated in a very heated discussion on another volatile topic and experienced a similar lesson in delivery. I would take it to heart.
Love to all