06-10-2014, 09:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-10-2014, 10:01 PM by Adonai One.)
(06-10-2014, 08:07 PM)Jeremy Wrote: For some reason, I just can't seem to grasp this. Is it as easy as just accepting ones position on a given scenario then honestly giving your opinion on the matter and the ways you disagree or are you to accept the position of the other self and that's the end of it? This kinds goes back to plenum's question as to passitivity. How can you be all accepting of an other selfs position or decision when that position/decision could negatively impact ones self or an other self?
The incorporation of all desires leads to universal acceptance at the end of this creation. How the incorporation is done is infinite in its ways. Acceptance is simply a satisfaction in that all is well and that you've done your duty towards yourself and others in the way you have chosen, which is inherent in all ways of being.
No being can universally accept all while still being with a veil of separation. What you note is simply the nature of the veil and illusion itself. Within this illusion, there is acceptance. Accepting is just acknowledging this inherent acceptance.
I hope this is clear.
(06-10-2014, 09:24 PM)Raz Wrote: everything that happens is acceptable or it would not be happening..."What does not happen" as an idea is a negation of what happens, has happened and will happen. In such, it all can happen and is acceptable.
I don't know if that is true; could be a coping mechanism or an enlightened point of view.
Summary: Acceptance of all is simply saying all is satisfactory even states that are not satisfactory. All is well.