05-26-2014, 07:17 PM
The actual mental process of acceptance, rarian or no
Unconscious Identification-> Conscious acknowledgement-> Honest evaluation*-> Acceptance and integration of experience
*The evaluation needs to be honest if you want to accept the (what I would call experience in other circles) "catalyst" as it was actually perceived. Otherwise the individual does not accept "catalyst" but rather what they would have liked to experience and that is not acceptance of experience as the alleged experience was not experienced. That's substitution of phantasy for reality.
That's the process, I don't know about faith or negative faith.
That substitution of ideas for experience that results in people becoming ungrounded that zm talked about is a product of that dishonest evaluation
Unconscious Identification-> Conscious acknowledgement-> Honest evaluation*-> Acceptance and integration of experience
*The evaluation needs to be honest if you want to accept the (what I would call experience in other circles) "catalyst" as it was actually perceived. Otherwise the individual does not accept "catalyst" but rather what they would have liked to experience and that is not acceptance of experience as the alleged experience was not experienced. That's substitution of phantasy for reality.
That's the process, I don't know about faith or negative faith.
That substitution of ideas for experience that results in people becoming ungrounded that zm talked about is a product of that dishonest evaluation