(06-11-2010, 11:22 AM)unity100 Wrote: it is ironic that despite telling me that mind is incapable and whatnot, you tell me to study plato. despite talking against all the principles modern science and its material logic puts out, you tell me to use modern science. moreover, you are talking about proof about noncausality of time/space, the astral part of existence, which is something modern science, and even many philosophies do not accept. leave aside the fact that had any existing philosophies were complete and useful, they would have had produced a lot of change and enlightened masses throughout thousands of years and we wouldnt be living in this mess.
...........
my feedback to you is - you are way too clung to your existing philosophies or religions. i will stop discussing you on this topic in this thread.
This has never really been a discussion. A discussion is the stated views of each participant and an attempt to bridge concepts to better understand each other. This has actually been more of a debate than a discussion..there is a difference. As far as I can see, Unity..you make no attempt to understand anyone's views.
Ali (and others) have made numerous attempts to draw you into a real discussion so that we might all begin to understand each other. Each time, you squashed his (and everyone else, for that matter) worldview in favor of your own. Never once conceding a single point or even trying to meet someone on that bridge.
If we can't even form a conceptual unity here...how do we eventually embrace true unity?
Richard