04-28-2014, 05:58 PM
Who defines what is appropriate and by what justification is an appropriate behavior true? Would a cold-calculating murder almost assuredly kill another out of a desire to falsify the existence of a thing or would it do so to see the nature of the creation itself? For if even if this intent is deciphered, could it be seen the opposite polarity of its intent is inadvertently explored due to its behaviors, inappropriate or appropriate according to a justification? One is left but to see the foundation of any appropriate behavior is inherently without justification but only a faith that such might be the case. There is only faith in a knowingness in the end and not a true knowingness of what path is taken.