Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial

    Thread: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial


    Adonai One (Offline)

    Married to The Universe in its Entirety
    Posts: 3,861
    Threads: 520
    Joined: Feb 2013
    #33
    04-28-2014, 12:10 AM (This post was last modified: 04-28-2014, 12:10 AM by Adonai One.)
    (04-28-2014, 12:07 AM)Tanner Wrote:
    (04-28-2014, 12:00 AM)Adonai One Wrote: How do you wish to be, manniz?

    (04-27-2014, 11:59 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (04-27-2014, 11:13 PM)Adonai One Wrote:
    (04-27-2014, 10:56 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Ultraviolet light is just a 1D frequency range of a vibrating photon, based in space/time, or "physical". "Metaphysical" is that which is of time/space, which was known before mentioned by Ra. Time/space, can be considered as Larson's "cosmic sector" and of course it's not visible, nor can it be made visible, because it's non-local. Time/space only shares a connection with space/time via mind which serves as a bridge between both realms. The brain is like a "device driver" for mind.
    Was the ideal of time/space and space/time as two separate concepts, and not entirely united concept complexes, denoted explicitly in the Law of One material?
    The ideal? Not sure what you mean. Time and space are inherently the same thing s/t = t/s = 1. When Ra says space/time, they are either referring to the physical sector or the spatial emphasis on that duality. And when they say time/space, it's either clock time or the metaphysical/temporal/cosmic sector.

    These two sectors exist in each density. Each density serves as a vibrational base for manifestation. Within the 1D space/time physical sector, when speeds are below that of light, then "space/time" and" time/space" are aspects of motion which forms all physicality.

    So the distinctions are illusory and are not based on any empirical observation?

    The empirical observation would be the observation and awareness of an "inner plane" (time/space) and an "outer plane" (space/time).

    Distinguished by what? Physical phenoma? Only death? Is death the only differential? Or could the human vision be simply tuned? Is the differential biology or is it simply an aspect of an illusion provided by a construct beyond human knowing?

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 05:27 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by AnthroHeart - 04-27-2014, 05:33 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Ashim - 04-27-2014, 05:35 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 05:36 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Rhayader - 04-27-2014, 05:51 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Ashim - 04-27-2014, 05:52 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by anagogy - 04-27-2014, 07:31 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 09:18 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 09:42 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 10:46 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:33 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:38 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:58 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 10:14 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 10:49 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:00 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-27-2014, 10:56 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:13 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-27-2014, 11:59 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:20 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:25 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:40 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:51 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Fang - 04-27-2014, 11:26 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:29 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Fang - 04-27-2014, 11:29 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:30 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:36 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:41 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:42 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:00 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:07 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:10 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:49 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 12:12 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:14 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:18 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:20 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:33 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 12:49 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 01:04 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 02:04 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 01:53 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:56 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by sunnysideup - 04-30-2014, 07:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-30-2014, 01:44 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode