Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial

    Thread: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial


    Unbound

    Guest
     
    #19
    04-27-2014, 11:29 PM
    The word, or "vibratory sound complex" called light is a creation of Love, of intelligent energy and is the manifestation of this energy and love. Eternity is, to me, a property of the One which is omniscient and is occurring at or during the stage of the first distortion, prior to the third distortion which is light, to use the terms of Ra.

    Quote:The vibration or density of love or understanding is not a term used in the same sense as the second distortion, Love; the distortion Love being the great activator and primal co-Creator of various creations using intelligent infinity; the vibration love being that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called “loving” without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom. Thus in vibratory sense love comes into light in the sense of the activity of unity in its free will. Love uses light and has the power to direct light in its distortions. Thus vibratory complexes recapitulate in reverse the creation in its unity, thus showing the rhythm or flow of the great heartbeat, if you will use this analogy.

    That being said, light is also limitless which can be taken, in my view, as the completely viewed progression from the first to the third distortion and onwards with each encompassing the next like a set of Matryoshka dolls. Eternity is not something which is accessed from within the densities but is the distinct pleasure of those entities crossing the threshold of the 7th, entering the 9th which is Eternity to me, and from there choosing the next octave to explore. The 8th is the Opening of the Octave, so to me one must use the 7th density in order to enter in to any octave from Eternity. Those choosing to take on the experiences of the next octave after this one will do so by re-entering from Eternity through the 7/8 Gateway within which is nestled the 9th. This probably doesn't make much sense because I haven't developed the language for expressing these concepts so I am somewhat grasping at concept straws to attempt to convey what I actually mean but I hope you can somewhat see past my cumbersome descriptions.

    It is not that light is not without a connection to the eternal, it does indeed exist as part of Eternity but Light itself is not the "substance" of Eternity itself but is, forever, the substance of the EXPERIENCE of Eternity. I suppose I am making the distinction between the observer and the observed, even if ultimately one singular system.
    [+] The following 2 members thanked thanked for this post:2 members thanked for this post
      • Adonai One, Parsons
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 05:27 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by AnthroHeart - 04-27-2014, 05:33 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Ashim - 04-27-2014, 05:35 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 05:36 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Rhayader - 04-27-2014, 05:51 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Ashim - 04-27-2014, 05:52 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by anagogy - 04-27-2014, 07:31 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 09:18 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 09:42 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 10:46 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:33 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:38 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:58 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 10:14 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 10:49 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:00 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-27-2014, 10:56 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:13 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-27-2014, 11:59 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:20 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:25 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:40 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:51 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Fang - 04-27-2014, 11:26 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:29 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Fang - 04-27-2014, 11:29 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-27-2014, 11:30 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:36 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-27-2014, 11:41 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-27-2014, 11:42 PM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:00 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:07 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:10 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:49 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 12:12 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:14 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:18 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 12:20 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 12:33 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 12:49 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by zenmaster - 04-28-2014, 01:04 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by manniz - 04-28-2014, 02:04 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Adonai One - 04-28-2014, 01:53 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-28-2014, 12:56 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by sunnysideup - 04-30-2014, 07:34 AM
    RE: Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial - by Unbound - 04-30-2014, 01:44 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode