(04-18-2014, 12:45 AM)zenmaster Wrote:this is a bs post (imo)(04-18-2014, 12:22 AM)isis Wrote: i can't deny things appear separate so i'm not exactly excluding actualized beingness.You may not be excluding fully actualized beingness from potential consideration, but it is indeed excluded from awareness. This provides you with an opportunity to learn something, if you are inclined, or hide in the dark until you do not need to be reminded that you are all things.
we'll just have to agree to disagree again
(04-18-2014, 05:16 AM)Fang Wrote:Quote:"this stone is a stone, it is also animal, it is also god, it is also Buddha, I do not venerate and love it because it could turn into this or that, but rather because it is already and always everything"
Have you actually read this book? You've been quoting a lot of things out of context lately...
this is a bs post (imo)
we'll just have to agree to disagree again