04-02-2014, 05:49 PM
Aha I believe the answer to that was in my post: "Yes, I am guilty of this also, naturally."
I did, in fact, contemplate exactly the point you are making Gary and decided that it would be worth the self-contradiction to make the point I desired to make.
In many ways I see this forum as being one mind with many voices within it. The person that is the forum's collective self has many different personalities and aspects of self which all interact. When I see threads like these and others I view it as an interaction between different self aspects in the same way I view an individual working with the different selves they have within their own minds. Thus there will be a voice for each different manner of intelligence which could be available to process the information.
I cannot really speak for others or how they choose to express themselves but for myself, I guess I see it that my perspective often puts me in a position where I am the voice speaking for the mystical, the mystery and the fantastic. In a mind, I would be that voice that ever urges one to grasp the impossible, to defy the improbable and to open the self to the mystery of the infinite self. I would be that voice that when the self is full of doubt, or fear or skepticism, it speaks of possibility, of imagination and wonder.
My way is not right, nor is it wrong, but it is my way and sometimes, alas, I must sacrifice the attempt to be perfect in my polarization for the same sake of interaction as any other.
I did, in fact, contemplate exactly the point you are making Gary and decided that it would be worth the self-contradiction to make the point I desired to make.
In many ways I see this forum as being one mind with many voices within it. The person that is the forum's collective self has many different personalities and aspects of self which all interact. When I see threads like these and others I view it as an interaction between different self aspects in the same way I view an individual working with the different selves they have within their own minds. Thus there will be a voice for each different manner of intelligence which could be available to process the information.
I cannot really speak for others or how they choose to express themselves but for myself, I guess I see it that my perspective often puts me in a position where I am the voice speaking for the mystical, the mystery and the fantastic. In a mind, I would be that voice that ever urges one to grasp the impossible, to defy the improbable and to open the self to the mystery of the infinite self. I would be that voice that when the self is full of doubt, or fear or skepticism, it speaks of possibility, of imagination and wonder.
My way is not right, nor is it wrong, but it is my way and sometimes, alas, I must sacrifice the attempt to be perfect in my polarization for the same sake of interaction as any other.