(12-30-2013, 08:02 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(12-30-2013, 07:43 PM)BrownEye Wrote:(12-30-2013, 07:09 PM)zenmaster Wrote:So any information towards the protection or reclamation of health would be an infringement of free will?(12-30-2013, 06:59 PM)BrownEye Wrote: But, what if Ra had stated these benefits? Would you still have the same doubts? Would you be able to test this for yourself? Would you have any actual discernment beyond the gross senses and the intellect?Due to infringement on free will, Ra would not introduce such an influential and distorted system of thought, therefore your hypothetical authority-figure situation is quite moot.
In positive channeling there is no procedural information transmitted that is not 1) specifically asked for and not 2) already part of the collective consciousness. So such specific philosophical/methodological/technological understandings are never going to be related in the first place (hence your moot hypothetical point).
If that is the case, why did Ra give an answer that the pharmaceutical Carla was taking was harming her? Pharmaceuticals are a type of technology.
So, hypothetically, Don could have asked about this and Ra may have answered.