12-19-2013, 01:52 AM
So you then acknowledge that there is the immaterial unmanifest as well?
Also, yes, why not? That the will is used within the limited spectrum of the first few rays make the will no less will. Plants react to pain, to music, they have even discovered that plants can be creative and seem to enjoy doing so. I certainly believe all creatures have free will. It appears that they do not because of the area of the spectrum within which they work. I feel that animals are purely emotionally driven by not just survival, but comfort and contentment. Plants and animals recognize different treatment.
If you have checked out any of Dr. Emoto's work it appears that even water is responsive to a mood or treatment. My point is, it is just a matter of complexity. All will is the same, but with varying degrees of freedom built in to each level of its use.
What I am confused about is the way you talk about "programs" as though the programs are not also the programmer. It is the free will of the logos that permeates its creation.
Also, yes, why not? That the will is used within the limited spectrum of the first few rays make the will no less will. Plants react to pain, to music, they have even discovered that plants can be creative and seem to enjoy doing so. I certainly believe all creatures have free will. It appears that they do not because of the area of the spectrum within which they work. I feel that animals are purely emotionally driven by not just survival, but comfort and contentment. Plants and animals recognize different treatment.
If you have checked out any of Dr. Emoto's work it appears that even water is responsive to a mood or treatment. My point is, it is just a matter of complexity. All will is the same, but with varying degrees of freedom built in to each level of its use.
What I am confused about is the way you talk about "programs" as though the programs are not also the programmer. It is the free will of the logos that permeates its creation.