12-09-2013, 06:42 PM
We each work from our own assessment/identification of what we think *is* the problem (i.e., external attack). We use appropriate solution based on assessment of problem (i.e., using protection/magic to counter external threat). When attempted solution does not work & problems persist or exacerbates, we could step back and re-assess problem. Then perhaps adjust course by framing problem in new ways and using new ways to resolve problem... Or we may continue using solution even if it doesn't seem to improve situation, if that's our personal choice.
There is a discrepancy between how others view your issue (that it is internal & pertaining to lower rays) and your assessment of the problem (that it is external & pertaining to higher rays). Perhaps both may be aspects of the problem. Each of our assessment of the problem may be aspect of the larger terraine here.
I think either side of the spectrum - totally accepting and totally rejecting something may be an imbalance. Why reject something so adamantly? Why accept one explanation so adamantly?
There is a discrepancy between how others view your issue (that it is internal & pertaining to lower rays) and your assessment of the problem (that it is external & pertaining to higher rays). Perhaps both may be aspects of the problem. Each of our assessment of the problem may be aspect of the larger terraine here.
I think either side of the spectrum - totally accepting and totally rejecting something may be an imbalance. Why reject something so adamantly? Why accept one explanation so adamantly?