04-24-2010, 01:26 AM
(04-23-2010, 05:04 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote:Ra Wrote:It is important to allow each seeker to enlighten itself rather than for any messenger to attempt in language to teach/learn for the entity, thus being teach/learner and learn/teacher. This is not in balance with your third density. We learn from you. We teach to you. Thus, we teach/learn. If we learned for you, this would cause imbalance in the direction of the distortion of free will.
otherself-jesse, what do you make of this quote? Personally, I don't think Ra is suggesting that we not try to teach. Instead, they are distinguishing between teaching to (appropriate) and learning for (can cause imbalance).
The answer lies specifically in the term "learning for". This means "giving the answers" to what the individual must come to understand in their own time and in their own way. Just as they taught the tarot, by answering questions of the student that had studied the cards and had come to both logical and heart-based conclusions, the same holds true for any teach/ learn learn/teach situation.
In order to give an answer, the correct question must be asked, but in order for the correct question to be asked, there must be an underlying knowledge, the foundation on which the question will be built.
We were lucky to have had Don ask the question, no matter how haphazardly he did so, for his life's work built the foundation of knowledge which gave him the knowledge to ask the right questions, at least for the most part.