04-18-2010, 12:15 PM
First, please excuse my continuance of the off topic-topic. I just want to be clear on what others are saying.
I was under the impression that Ra does support that after 6d there is no negative harvest because the path that is not will have to be abandoned. Going into 6d, there is a uniting of both paths...to where they can all merge together into the 7th having no between anymore.
Can someone posts a link that says there will be a negative harvest in 6d please and if there is support for this not being so...can someone help still?
Now further on topic...the light being...or can I say, all light beings? Anyone heard of the Shemsu Hor? They are known as the Shining Ones...sometimes called 'Horus's disciples. Then we also have ancient references to people that seemed to 'shine' like the sun. So first, I wonder if these beings are really ancient ones that looked different then us. Second, there is strong evidence that the word 'Lucifer' is a title that relates someone to 'venus' the shining luminary that seems to 'rise' and 'fall'. Third, some say Lucifer is like the brother of Jesus, that we need both polarities of the archetypes, both of them bringing forth a different side to the same coin. Could it be that Lucifer doesnt exist past our archetypical mind?
Saying all of that...the day we can embrace both paths...is the day we can embrace ourselves with love. When one can appreciate both the dark and the light for they both bring = needs for us to, is the day we start to mature in our spiritual nature. Seeing how both paths form us and create us, we can let go of regrets and see it all as needed.
Has anyone seen the moving 'Legion'? This movie helped me understand the love that lower entities may have for us can be very strong.
In the movie, the archangel Michael is given a 'task'. He is to terminate the human species. God had lost faith in man. Michael, however, had not. He refused the task, in which he fell to Earth. He stripped himself of his Divine Wings, and fought along side man against his own kind, the angels.
As heart wrenching as it may seem to 'refuse' God, I think we all know the Divine doesnt conduct Theeself in such ways. But besides that...the love story of Michael for man...reminded me of Lucifer and man.
If Lucifer, the fallen one, was a real being...I dont think its name is Lucifer, for that name seems to have a fairly recent origin.
My mother told me something odd, through her NDE. She said that when she went under the Sphinx, she saw pictures in stone of what seemed to be the 'angels' standing before a throned being, here on Earth. I asked her if she felt then that the story of the 'fallen' beings was true, what was her feeling on the image. She was not sure what her feeling was about it. What confused her is she was Michael, her guide that she was with, in these images...and she didnt consider Michael to be a 'fallen angel'. I then told her...mabey it wasnt a 'bad thing' that angels came here to Earth...mabey it was a good thing that man later made it out to be bad and evil.
I know I pose more questions then answers, but anywho...
I was under the impression that Ra does support that after 6d there is no negative harvest because the path that is not will have to be abandoned. Going into 6d, there is a uniting of both paths...to where they can all merge together into the 7th having no between anymore.
Can someone posts a link that says there will be a negative harvest in 6d please and if there is support for this not being so...can someone help still?
Now further on topic...the light being...or can I say, all light beings? Anyone heard of the Shemsu Hor? They are known as the Shining Ones...sometimes called 'Horus's disciples. Then we also have ancient references to people that seemed to 'shine' like the sun. So first, I wonder if these beings are really ancient ones that looked different then us. Second, there is strong evidence that the word 'Lucifer' is a title that relates someone to 'venus' the shining luminary that seems to 'rise' and 'fall'. Third, some say Lucifer is like the brother of Jesus, that we need both polarities of the archetypes, both of them bringing forth a different side to the same coin. Could it be that Lucifer doesnt exist past our archetypical mind?
Saying all of that...the day we can embrace both paths...is the day we can embrace ourselves with love. When one can appreciate both the dark and the light for they both bring = needs for us to, is the day we start to mature in our spiritual nature. Seeing how both paths form us and create us, we can let go of regrets and see it all as needed.
Has anyone seen the moving 'Legion'? This movie helped me understand the love that lower entities may have for us can be very strong.
In the movie, the archangel Michael is given a 'task'. He is to terminate the human species. God had lost faith in man. Michael, however, had not. He refused the task, in which he fell to Earth. He stripped himself of his Divine Wings, and fought along side man against his own kind, the angels.
As heart wrenching as it may seem to 'refuse' God, I think we all know the Divine doesnt conduct Theeself in such ways. But besides that...the love story of Michael for man...reminded me of Lucifer and man.
If Lucifer, the fallen one, was a real being...I dont think its name is Lucifer, for that name seems to have a fairly recent origin.
My mother told me something odd, through her NDE. She said that when she went under the Sphinx, she saw pictures in stone of what seemed to be the 'angels' standing before a throned being, here on Earth. I asked her if she felt then that the story of the 'fallen' beings was true, what was her feeling on the image. She was not sure what her feeling was about it. What confused her is she was Michael, her guide that she was with, in these images...and she didnt consider Michael to be a 'fallen angel'. I then told her...mabey it wasnt a 'bad thing' that angels came here to Earth...mabey it was a good thing that man later made it out to be bad and evil.
I know I pose more questions then answers, but anywho...