Quote:Yes i took a break from these forums, and when i came back i checked a couple of threads that i was involved in. One of them was the one where we had our argument.
LOL! If you call me making a 1 or 2 line reply to your somewhat longer post on that thread an 'argument' then you should really meet my wife!
Your comments are thought provoking as always Crown.
I will take them to heart as I wish you godspeed and the best of fortune.
(06-15-2013, 12:46 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(06-15-2013, 12:30 PM)Guenivere Wrote: They are unable to discuss specific scientific ideas, for example, without someone who has a proper background in the science that is being examined.had to laugh at that, as if they were ever able to discuss *with* proper background. Remember, it's all irrational intuition - vague notional impressions, by its very nature. Science is largely rationally interpreted experience.
You use this type of argument repeatedly, this puzzles me.
For the time being I will take my "irrational vague notional impressions" over another's "rationally interpreted experience".
Rational means simply 'capable of reasoning'.
I guess it's a matter of who one listens to and gives trust.