Wanderers and the Harvest

[anagogy]

All you have to do is say, in retrospect, that "the course is not as originally planned" to say that the entity did not "take care". Which of course is silly.

The situation I was referencing was the situation in which a positive wanderer incarnates in 3rd density for the purpose of raising the planetary vibration and assisting potential harvestees. That is the "original plan" of the higher density being that "wanders". So, in this particular context "taking care" with their polarization would simply mean not polarizing towards the negative (in effect, behaving in a way towards other selves that was not consonant with positive polarity). I don't really interpret that as "silly", rather, just pragmatic.

Even if they were relatively neutral in their interactions with other selves, their purpose in wandering would be more or less negated in such a circumstance. Not necessarily negated in the sense that they can't go home after a death, but negated in that it would kind of defeat the whole purpose.

After all, they aren't here to just "chill out".

One can't judge their own polarity any more than you can judge another's. People resonating with their sincere, "highest good" will be "taking care" and still polarize negatively. Understanding is not of this density, so it's silly to say "take care".

I guess I disagree with that assertion. Someone resonating with their sincere "highest good" will not polarize negatively, from my perspective. Someone resonating with their sincere "highest personal pleasure" might polarize negatively however.

I don't see it as particularly hard to judge one's own polarity. One need merely take an honest look at one's behavior and one's dominant intent to know what direction one is polarizing. If one is even somewhat conscious of the spiritual path, one can plainly see if one's actions are done in the spirit of helping the whole, or merely helping the self. Certainly there are individuals who delude themselves into thinking their self-serving behavior is actually service to others, but I wouldn't regard such individuals as very conscious. With consciousness comes the ability to honestly and objectively evaluate one's true motivations.

Anyone who is conscious enough to be beyond the "sinkhole of indifference" is undoubtedly aware of what direction they are polarized in.

Knowing may not be of this density, but that doesn't mean we can't understand or know anything.

And that degree of significance is called "polarity", which is what you were saying, whether or not you want to acknowledge it.

I wasn't aware I had said otherwise. My whole point was simply in response to your assertion that, "[...] it is not important at all to have STO action (or STS action) in order to go back to their density."

So wanderers may do as they like, but if that involves significantly STS behavior (i can't imagine what else "negative orientation towards other selves" would mean if not "service to self"), they wouldn't necessarily return to their native density.

Which no one but the OP had claimed.

Claimed what exactly? Not entirely sure what you are referring to?

You were claiming that polarization wasn't a factor in whether a wanderer returns to their native density after their sojourn of 3rd density "wandering".

I'm simply offering my understanding that polarization *IS* a factor, as that Ra quote corroborated.

---

This was my concern when I did a very STS thing when I was not in my right mind. I acted without love. I'm thinking that one bad action or mistake won't cause one to flip polarities. Especially if this mistake is not repeated again. I strive to demonstrate love.

No, I very much doubt it is quite that fragile.

My understanding is that your "negative orientation towards other selves" would have to become a deeply ingrained part of your character to get you caught up in the planetary vibration. The occasional deviation from an otherwise predominately STO habit of thought and behavior won't stop you from going home after this incarnation.