01-06-2013, 02:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2013, 08:42 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(01-06-2013, 02:36 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Not to belabor this, but "time/space" is also spoken of in a reply, not a query. My point was that the concepts originated from Don, Carla, Jim and to them, from their readings. Do you understand that where Ra introduced a particular terminology is therefore is irrelevant?
Yes. I get it. Ra couldn't have spoken much about the Internet back in 1981, when it hadn't yet been invented, and therefore wasn't present in the group mind.
Quote:probably because it is rather meaningless in unpolarized entities.
It's also rather meaningless in polarized entities. Which is why the Law of One does not blink at it.
STS and STO: The difference between these two terms are the words "self" and "other" which are interchangeable, according to the Law of One. Doesn't matter if we are polarized or not. The terms are still interchangeable.
Quote:And "service to self results in service to others". That's why they are "polarities".
Yes. Polarities- not opposites. It is entirely possible for me to serve both you and myself simultaneously. In fact- it would be impossible for that not to be the case. Just like there is no such thing as a unipolar magnet. Again- that's why the whole concept is rather meaningless. We could edit out all the references to STS/STO in the material, and we wouldn't lose much of anything important. We might actually be better off.
Quote:why does that matter?
It matters because application of the wrong principle yields wrong results.