Post-harvest continuity of consciousness

[Tenet Nosce]

And anything in the Ra Material that contradicts or denies that infinity by speaking of concluded futures and alternate realities, would heavily disturb those vibrations whenever the two were being compared in the field of consciousness.

Yes, but this is just the thing, Shin'Ar. Nothing in the Ra Material contradicts or denies the mystery of infinity. What you are responding to in this forum- and have been from the moment you joined- is other people's distorted ideas about what the material says. Not the material itself.

You keep objecting to ideas that have been passed around the forum, parroted and repeated by members, and taken at face value as actually having a sound basis in the material, when in fact they aren't based in the material at all, but have been projected into it.

For example:

Thus all begins and ends in mystery.

These mysteries are of sixth and seventh density and are not available for our speaking.

Another self cannot teach/learn enlightenment, but only teach/learn information, inspiration, or a sharing of love, of mystery, of the unknown that makes the other-self reach out and begin the seeking process that ends in a moment, but who can know when an entity will open the gate to the present?

It is not our intent in this particular project to create erroneous information but to express in the confining ambiance of your language system the feeling of the infinite mystery of the one creation in its infinite and intelligent unity.

However, the understandings we have to share begin and end in mystery.

Thus we can only say we assume an infinite progression though we understand it to be cyclical in nature and, as we have said, clad in mystery.

So you see, your comment I quoted above is actually quite off-base. If you had actually read the material, you would cease to believe that you are arguing against it. Because you are not. What you are actually doing is arguing against other people's distorted views of the material, which are being presented as fact simply because these have become the views of the majority. As if- simply because the majority of people "believe" in something, it actually becomes an accurate representation of reality.

Since you clearly haven't read the material, you of course wouldn't know any better. So you are pretty much in the same boat as all the other members who haven't read the material either, but continue to speak about concepts contained within it as if they had.