12/21/2012: David Wilcock, Harvest, Ra, New Age Gurus. What does it all mean?

[almostdone]

Going back to D Wilcock's analysis of 2012, I was reading some parts of this essay he wrote:
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/artic...-the-facts

I realized he continues to make the mistake (so it seems) of connecting 2012 with the Ra material --again, we only have "approximations". If you substitute "2012" in that essay by...2013-14-15, that is "approximated time" then the analysis is, I think, very sound overall (although with the quotes that are relevant to prove the point, which leaves many other parts out, but is there any other way to do these things?...

I have to tell you, I never gave a thought to 2012 (or 2011) before reading the Ra material. That is because it seems the only quote about the gradual approach, like DW points out, is the one mentioning 100-700 years.

Funny thing is that even people that claim that "something happened" on the 21st, are committing the same mistake, I think, than the ones then blaming DW for not being "ascension" and "nothing happened". For, there is no direct connection between that date and the Ra material. Still, thinking that there is a gradual happening to Harvest has the same validity as a sudden one on today's date Dec 31st 2012. 2012 has not changed anything...Dec 21/12 has not proved anything...

Something does not feel quite right with all this. Even as a mentioned in a previous post, the only hint of Harvest we have at the end of the second cycle, a "light being" (moreover from the Confederation!) appears.

We became so fixated with 2012 because of the desire of changes. And a gradual system does not mean things would not change rapidly.