11-12-2012, 10:44 PM
(11-12-2012, 10:31 PM)Icaro Wrote:I don't think it has to be that way. Some people just describe "a way" (a philosophy) and provide a rather exhaustive characterizations using different examples/analogies. So at once it's more accessible, more compelling, and its restrictions become more apparent. There is really a lot you could do to layer it into an intriguing puzzle which would be very unlikely to infringe.(11-12-2012, 09:08 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Everything you know is based on your own experience without consideration of each and every possible learner's experience. Those considerations are necessary in order to establish context which reduces the possibility for misunderstanding. Teaching is always going to be more effective if you are directly and dynamically interacting with another's worldview.
That's why I feel a "book of answers" may be an infringement in a way. One would be doing all the learning.