11-06-2012, 10:13 PM
Regarding the duality of our perception of the concept of "free will" (free vs. not free) and regarding whether logoi conceived of/perceived the STS path, there is this quote to consider:
The will has apparently always been free throughout the experiences of the universe. It's just that the concept evolves, like all other things, and has become "more free". Free will vs. free-er will rather than free will vs. not free will.
Quote:78.19 Questioner: So the original evolution then was planned by the Logos but the first distortion was not extended to the product. At some point this first distortion was extended and the first service-to-self polarity emerged. Is this correct and if so, could you tell me the history of this process of emergence?
Ra: I am Ra. As proem let me state that the Logoi always conceived of themselves as offering free will to the sub-Logoi in their care. The sub-Logoi had freedom to experience and experiment with consciousness, the experiences of the body, and the illumination of the spirit. That having been said, we shall speak to the point of your query.
The first Logos to instill what you now see as free will, in the full sense, in its sub-Logoi came to this creation due to contemplation in depth of the concepts or possibilities of conceptualizations of what we have called the significators. The Logos posited the possibility of the mind, the body, and the spirit as being complex. In order for the significator to be what it is not, it then must be granted the free will of the Creator. This set in motion a quite lengthy, in your terms, series of Logoi improving or distilling this seed thought. The key was the significator becoming a complex.
The will has apparently always been free throughout the experiences of the universe. It's just that the concept evolves, like all other things, and has become "more free". Free will vs. free-er will rather than free will vs. not free will.