Ra's Adventures in Wonderland

[Parsons]

TN, I hope you aren't basing most of your argument refuting the Choice of 3D being polarity on 1.6. You can't really take that tiny bite size quote out of 1.6 without considering the context of the question and the rest of the reply. That, is impossible of course:

1.6 Questioner: (The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.)
Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.

In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

Ra seems to be zooming out to the macrocosm and implying that enrolling in this octave isn't necessary if you figure out the nature of polarity without having to learn it the 'hard way'. Being in 3o3d certainly seems like doing it the hard way.