The Wanderer's Prerogative

[Lavazza]

I am not so much talking about you getting hurt. I am talking about you hurting others with the intent of doing the right thing. I am certain that many of the STS elite are utterly convinced that what they're doing is the right thing, not just for themselves, but also for the Earth as a whole. If you ask them to classify themselves many of them would classify themselves as STO... In fact they do this routinely.

Just so that we're on the same page, the "action" we are talking about is the sharing of information, correct? If this conversation is not about just the sharing of one's higher truth and actually about some sort of real action, then I would like to retract my comments on the matter. That's something else altogether. (e.g. extreme activism, religious style converting, etc)

The aliens Lavazza mentions make a huge deal about not infringing on free will. Why are we better than them that we do not need these safeguards?

I'm really not sure that there is anything to worry about here, specifically in the ET / Human comparison. As I mentioned above, there is one very clear difference between the two, one is invested within the Earth sphere and what happens there. The other, although interested in helping, is not actually tied up in Human affairs directly. As such there are different "rules" that apply, as it were. ETs are only willing to share information with us with the context that we can refute it easily if we should choose, even refute that they exist.

What if many of the great people in our history had been as concerned about free will as our ET friends are? Surely many a war would have been prevented, but we know that the illusion of separation is what drives most conflict anyways. What if the leaders of compassion had chosen free will as priority? Would we have heard the knowledge of Ghandi, M.L. King, or others? These people had the burn to share their knowledge of love with the world, and they shared it with many who did not like it.

Now I'm not saying you should beat anyone's door down and shove the Law of One books in to their hands, etc. My version of sharing, my "prerogative" as it were, is to share with those people who I personally feel are wanting to have it, or would be open to it. But I wouldn't be upset if someone tried to share it in a more direct way. How can anyone be certain that that is not what they designed to do before incarnation, just as King doubtlessly designed his own life to share the message of peace and equality?

Just some different views.

with much love, your dark roasted friend,
Lavazza

---

The other, although interested in helping, is not actually tied up in Human affairs directly. As such there are different "rules" that apply, as it were.

Hurray! I have for once actually been able to remember a relevant Q'uo quote AND find it in the library, AND have time to post it! Wow. Ok, here it goes. Q'uo responding to a question of transient (and free-will busting nature), from Nov 12th 2006: (see my bolded areas)

My sister, we thank you for this query. Our response
must be somewhat indirect as we cannot make a
frontal approach to your query. We are those who
come on a vibration of unconditional love. Our
contact, and our type of contact in general, does not
have the facility with detailed, earthly information of
a practical nature that, say, an inner-planes entity
might have. It is not our place to interfere with the
governance or the affairs in general of planet Earth.
For good information on how to affect your
government, your politics, your economics, or your
society in general by practical and worldly means, we
would strongly suggest that you inquire from other
sources than we. We are a carefully tuned contact
that focuses upon spiritual principles. From that
level, my sister, we may answer you, but it is perhaps
an answer other than you would have wished.
And for that we can only say that our ability to speak
through this instrument is based upon her preserving
a certain tuning. Were she to slip out of this tuning
range, we would be unable to continue offering her
information. However, she might be able to
continue receiving information from an entity of a
negative nature that was able to ape or imitate the
vibration of those of the Q’uo group.