10-21-2012, 07:23 AM
(10-20-2012, 11:29 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Sure, wherever they are found. For example, we have noticed that a great many contentious points can be traced back to Session 17 and Session 63. I'm just suggesting it could be helpful to reconcile those kinds of points using the statement of Ra's nature and purpose in Session One.
I'm not really sure about valuing one session over another, and it seems odd to value the one non-trance session over the 105 trance sessions. Ra always tried to focus on timeless principles, no matter how transient the question.
What in particular troubles you about sessions 17 and 63?