08-27-2014, 06:02 AM
No, I perceive the attempt to play 6D here as cowardice.
What about those beings who are not sufficiently polarized to defend themselves through acceptance or offer such a service to the negative?
(08-27-2014, 05:56 AM)Adonai One Wrote: The well-being of the positive polarizing being that accepts The Law of One knows that all is well in all situations. The positive polarity of a being that is higher than the density of 5th will see that no situation is of any true harm to the self as the self will be found in any consequence of any infringement. You perceive this as cowardice. I perceive this as embracing all as the self, all as one being.
To radiate the self so far as to deny the infringing being as self is to deny the Law of One.
(08-27-2014, 05:55 AM)Unbound Wrote: Also, would it not be "acting against" to do anything other than be manipulated if that is what the negative entity wants? Even escape is acting against their desire to manipulate.
It is not, in intent, acting against the entity as the entity will in almost all cases be unable to fully control a positively polarizing being, unable to totally merge its distortions with a positive polarizing being fully to where the infringed being can begin to negatively polarize.
There is no possible true service towards the negative entity so there is nothing to act against. The service the entity would desire in this scenario is unattainable and the best service a positive polarizing being can provide is to attempt to teach/learn the negative entity that it must satisfy its desires to control in more beneficial ways other than attempting to assimilate beings that cannot be assimilated.
What about those beings who are not sufficiently polarized to defend themselves through acceptance or offer such a service to the negative?