03-07-2012, 01:02 PM
I have heard many accounts of the 'true story of Jesus'. I even remember the one that Billy Meier told when he 'time-travelled' back with Asket and met Jesus lol.
there are also accounts to paint Jesus as just a 'man', in the very aptly named book - Jesus the Man, by Barbara Thiering.
- -
one of the most controversial accounts is the one given by Ra. The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a tree and withered it, but in this passage here, Ra claims that Jesus actually killed someone in anger:
now, this was really an 'accident', a spilling over of the emotions as a young child. Surely you can't give a kid karma for something like this?
Ra says otherwise:
and eventually an atonement was reached:
17.20 The entity was absolved karmically of the destruction of an other-self when it was in the last portion of lifetime and spoke upon what you would call a cross saying, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.” In forgiveness lies the stoppage of the wheel of action, or what you call karma.
- -
so there we have it.
the story that you choose to believe about Jesus comes down to a matter of Faith. Although we trust Ra and the words that he transmits, there is no 'ultimate proof', especially when it comes to long distant historical claims.
there are many things in the Law of One that can be verified through practice (the balancing exercises, working with the archetypes, unlocking the energy centres). Other things 'cannot'.
the full story that Ra gives in Session 17 of the life of Jesus is the one that I am currently 'believing in'.
thanks
there are also accounts to paint Jesus as just a 'man', in the very aptly named book - Jesus the Man, by Barbara Thiering.
- -
one of the most controversial accounts is the one given by Ra. The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a tree and withered it, but in this passage here, Ra claims that Jesus actually killed someone in anger:
Quote:17.19 Questioner: How did Jesus learn this during his incarnation?
Ra: I am Ra. This entity learned the ability by a natural kind of remembering at a very young age. Unfortunately, this entity first discovered his ability to penetrate intelligent infinity by becoming the distortion you call “angry” at a playmate. This entity was touched by the entity known as Jesus and was fatally wounded.
now, this was really an 'accident', a spilling over of the emotions as a young child. Surely you can't give a kid karma for something like this?
Ra says otherwise:
Quote:18.8 Questioner: Then an entity four years old would be totally responsible for any actions that were against or inharmonious with the Law of One. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
and eventually an atonement was reached:
17.20 The entity was absolved karmically of the destruction of an other-self when it was in the last portion of lifetime and spoke upon what you would call a cross saying, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.” In forgiveness lies the stoppage of the wheel of action, or what you call karma.
- -
so there we have it.
the story that you choose to believe about Jesus comes down to a matter of Faith. Although we trust Ra and the words that he transmits, there is no 'ultimate proof', especially when it comes to long distant historical claims.
there are many things in the Law of One that can be verified through practice (the balancing exercises, working with the archetypes, unlocking the energy centres). Other things 'cannot'.
the full story that Ra gives in Session 17 of the life of Jesus is the one that I am currently 'believing in'.
thanks