03-11-2011, 12:52 PM
They say it started in march 9-10. it seems to have done indeed.
so, when does it end ?
so, when does it end ?
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
03-11-2011, 12:52 PM
They say it started in march 9-10. it seems to have done indeed.
so, when does it end ?
03-11-2011, 02:32 PM
December 21st 2011 or 2012?
03-11-2011, 02:47 PM
(03-11-2011, 12:52 PM)unity100 Wrote: They say it started in march 9-10. it seems to have done indeed. May be this helps - http://www.calleman.com/content/articles...y_wave.htm It could be completely erroneous, of course. May the ONE guide in terms of understanding.
03-11-2011, 02:57 PM
so a phase is 234 or so days ? 260.
03-11-2011, 03:01 PM
03-11-2011, 03:03 PM
so, a phase in mayan calendar, (tzolkin ?) is 260 days, or 234 days ?
ie, 'we are in the last phase' -> ok we are in a phase, but how long is a phase ?
03-11-2011, 03:07 PM
(03-11-2011, 03:03 PM)unity100 Wrote: so, a phase in mayan calendar, (tzolkin ?) is 260 days, or 234 days ? The table in the following link may provide some illumination. A 'phase' appears to be a complex of a non-variable unit with a variable exponential unit. http://www.calleman.com/content/pyramid_...usness.htm
03-11-2011, 03:40 PM
so, there says a phase is 234 days, and it ends in 28/10 2011. 28 th of october 2011 then.
03-11-2011, 05:07 PM
that coincides with what Ra said in 1981. its approx 30 years.
03-11-2011, 06:03 PM
03-11-2011, 06:21 PM
how so ?
03-11-2011, 09:05 PM
The word approximate
03-12-2011, 09:00 AM
well, the 1 year precision vicinity for approximation seems quite accurate so far.
03-12-2011, 09:05 AM
(03-12-2011, 09:00 AM)unity100 Wrote: well, the 1 year precision vicinity for approximation seems quite accurate so far. In my opinion, Ra definitely came across a fastidious stickler for accuracy throughout the LOO. However, in order to preserve freewill in letter, Ra moved within the realm of portraying sensitive information through technical truthfulness, in my interpretation. That meant no falsehood was conveyed, but nothing much that could infringe individual and/or planetary freewill was given away.
03-15-2011, 05:39 PM
03-15-2011, 07:20 PM
fastidious stickler hahaha.
|
|