02-02-2010, 10:07 PM
Ok, I've done a lot of reading, and will be the first to admit there's just way too much information to be able to research it all. I know the importance of taking what resonates with us, and leaving behind what does not.
I'm on my 30-40th book (I've lost count) in the last half a year, and currently am reading A Wanderer's Handbook (Carla Rueckert) and Shift of the Ages (David Wilcock). Much of the stuff in Wanderer's Handbook isn't really validatable, except for whether it resonates with me. Much of it does, though not everyone's story has been my experience.
Then with Shift of the Ages, David mentions how "The stack of Internet-printed research books that have gone into the Convergence series is now about four or five feet tall – and you will not have to repeat these steps yourself, as herein you will find the distilled end-product of these labors"
Well, I kind of take David at his word, as I get a really good feeling about him, and his hard work. I can't possibly go and verify everything that is said to see if it's truth or not, good or bad, or whatever. So, in reading, I take what works for me, and what if it happens to not be truth? I don't think he'd lie, but if I don't research it first hand, does that make me gullible?
Then some of the films I've seen, Esoteric Agenda and Kymatica for instance, that talk about a New World Order, and such. People have talked about things like these for years.
But if I don't go research every fact therein to rule out and prove whether they are true or not, am I being gullible or critical because I agree or disagree without having something to back that up?
With Love,
Gemini Wolf
I'm on my 30-40th book (I've lost count) in the last half a year, and currently am reading A Wanderer's Handbook (Carla Rueckert) and Shift of the Ages (David Wilcock). Much of the stuff in Wanderer's Handbook isn't really validatable, except for whether it resonates with me. Much of it does, though not everyone's story has been my experience.
Then with Shift of the Ages, David mentions how "The stack of Internet-printed research books that have gone into the Convergence series is now about four or five feet tall – and you will not have to repeat these steps yourself, as herein you will find the distilled end-product of these labors"
Well, I kind of take David at his word, as I get a really good feeling about him, and his hard work. I can't possibly go and verify everything that is said to see if it's truth or not, good or bad, or whatever. So, in reading, I take what works for me, and what if it happens to not be truth? I don't think he'd lie, but if I don't research it first hand, does that make me gullible?
Then some of the films I've seen, Esoteric Agenda and Kymatica for instance, that talk about a New World Order, and such. People have talked about things like these for years.
But if I don't go research every fact therein to rule out and prove whether they are true or not, am I being gullible or critical because I agree or disagree without having something to back that up?
With Love,
Gemini Wolf