Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters The written vs the spoken traditions

    Thread: The written vs the spoken traditions


    Plenum (Offline)

    ...
    Posts: 6,188
    Threads: 1,013
    Joined: Dec 2011
    #1
    11-11-2013, 02:44 AM
    much has been made in certain traditions of having a lineage of teachers and training. Here the disciplining and screening and assessment is strong. This is more a personal tradition, of one to one teaching.

    Then there is the written tradition, which enables a wider dissemination of ideas, but also permits the proliferation of confusion as the written word can be much misinterpreted, and there is not the corrective measure of a teacher assessing the learning as the teachings are given.

    it is not one or the other; we can make use of both techniques.

    - -

    there also seems to be something in the written tradition which leads to codification and rigidity; although the same thing can happen in any group where there is a strong leadership presence.

    in the end, its the transmission and dissemination of understandings, regardless of the words used that is the important thing. Or as the buddha has referenced in the past - the use of expedient means.

    anyway, the thought just came up in relation to a small quote; which was purely informative (on Ra's part) and contained no seed of this written/spoken divide. (that was purely me).

    "88.20 Questioner: Well, how did the teacher relay information to the student with respect to visualization?

    Ra: I am Ra. The process was cabalistic; that is, of the oral tradition of mouth to ear."

    - -

      •
    Marc (Offline)

    Hoo The Fuck
    Posts: 639
    Threads: 42
    Joined: Dec 2012
    #2
    11-11-2013, 04:40 PM
    I very much appreciate that there is written material out there. It does have the ability to be very distorted, take the bible for example, but I still find it necessary. Not everyone that wants to learn the mysteries can just find a master to initiate them.

    The downsides to the written word are mass ignorance of actually having some decent sort of comprehensive skill of reading.

    On the other hand keeping that away from people exerts a sense of control to the ones who do know it. Take the reformation, for example.

    The elite who had acess to the bible would misinterpret it and hide parts of it to control the mass populace. But then when people started reading it for themselves they came up with some pretty crazy doctrines...

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode