![]() |
The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me (/showthread.php?tid=9034) |
The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me - Adonai One - 04-25-2014 Don't take this on authority, please. It's just simply an attempt at deducing these set of laws which I originally thought were singular laws without aspects. These laws are based on much of what an entity would do while speaking to an entity in a channeling capacity, but also applies when one communicates to another as I will use this information. Please use as you wish. This is not necessarily truth. Quote:The Law of One: All things are always in unity. RE: The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me - AnthroHeart - 04-26-2014 I don't know if I live without significant distortion. I tend to believe in what is not real. RE: The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me - native - 04-26-2014 Good summary. I agree that it applies to communicating with others, and I think it was what Ra was attempting to teach overall. Because if it's done properly, we channel intelligent energy..the mind, body, and spirit move in a sacramental rhythm. Ra refers to Logoi as energy centers, and that we are also a logos of course; centers of energy. So when moving about interacting with others, I see it as energy work..balancing energy centers..learning to decrease resistance to what is, while also not creating disharmony in others by not shattering or attempting to control their reality. RE: The Laws of One/Free will/Responsibility/Confusion as interpreted by me - anagogy - 04-26-2014 To me the law of confusion and law of free will are basically the same, and could be summarized by simply stating that all beings are free to believe what they choose to believe. We might even more succinctly define it as the "law of non-interference". Infringement is basically manipulating others into believing as you want them to believe (which is basically how STS beings create their own reality). There are various degrees to this kind of "infringement". Essentially, you will find evidence to support whatever you *sincerely* believe. Consequentially, you will repel evidence of anything contrary to the belief to the exact same degree as the purity of the belief. So in some cosmic sense, what is "real" is somewhat arbitrary, but there are those beliefs which are more consonant with oneness than other beliefs, and these are the stepping stones towards "truth" or "the real world" or whatever you prefer to call it. |