+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Ra in Egypt (/showthread.php?tid=7676)
Ra in Egypt - Plenum - 07-26-2013
Ra chose an incarnate form of interaction with the Egyptians at some stage.
can we even speculate as to how long they visited for?
Quote:23.6 Questioner: I see. Then at this time you did not contact them. Can you tell me the same— answer the same questions I just asked with respect to your next attempt to contact the Egyptians?
Ra: I am Ra. The next attempt was prolonged. It occurred over a period of time. The nexus, or center, of our efforts was a decision upon our parts that there was a sufficient calling to attempt to walk among your peoples as brothers.
We laid this plan before the Council of Saturn, offering ourselves as service-oriented Wanderers of the type which land directly upon the inner planes without incarnative processes. Thus we emerged, or materialized, in physical-chemical complexes representing as closely as possible our natures, this effort being to appear as brothers and spend a limited amount of time as teachers of the Law of One, for there was an ever-stronger interest in the sun body, and this vibrates in concordance with our particular distortions.
We discovered that for each word we could utter, there were thirty impressions we gave by our very being, which confused those entities we had come to serve.
After a short period we removed ourselves from these entities and spent much time attempting to understand how best to serve those to whom we had offered ourselves in love/light.
this 'short period' ... is it 2 weeks? a month? 3 months?
a short period would definitely be less than a year, right?
RE: Ra in Egypt - Adonai One - 07-26-2013
3 years. Don't ask how I know. If this doesn't resonate, leave it.
RE: Ra in Egypt - AnthroHeart - 07-26-2013
To Ra, a million years is nothing. So I can't foresee how long a short visit would be.
RE: Ra in Egypt - Ankh - 07-26-2013
(07-26-2013, 05:02 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: To Ra, a million years is nothing. So I can't foresee how long a short visit would be.
Hahaha!! That's what I thought too! Love you, man!
RE: Ra in Egypt - sdrawkcab - 07-30-2013
Precisely! Ra's "short period" may seem like a lifetime to us.
RE: Ra in Egypt - anagogy - 07-30-2013
(07-26-2013, 04:00 AM)plenum Wrote: this 'short period' ... is it 2 weeks? a month? 3 months?
a short period would definitely be less than a year, right?
Good question.
Long enough for them to become thoroughly convinced, as a culture, that gold was the skin of the gods.
RE: Ra in Egypt - AnthroHeart - 07-30-2013
(07-26-2013, 05:18 PM)Ankh Wrote:(07-26-2013, 05:02 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: To Ra, a million years is nothing. So I can't foresee how long a short visit would be.
Hahaha!! That's what I thought too! Love you, man!
Thanks. It's good to feel loved, as I don't get that much in life except from my wolfie.
I don't think the building of the pyramids happened overnight.
RE: Ra in Egypt - Hototo - 07-30-2013
Their way of measuring time is so different from us that our linear one directional sense of time makes measuring their actions on our level in terms of length of time difficult.
They may have "been" in eqypt in time/space adjusting small things, then going back to the drawing board to see what happened, then adjusting again, over and over again like that one scientist in Stargate Sg-1 trying to get that time portal to work endlessly getting the team stuck in repeting time, excepting in the case of Ra, with intent.
After X amount of attempts, all their "parallel times" produced the same or much the same conclusion, they were unable to effect anything more than a few waking up here and there.
So they decided to pick a random timeline from all their potentials they worked with and jump to another time period and try to work there.
So imagine you have a console in front of you where you have our current Earth timeline, you go into the "ancient eqypt" mode and try something, you watch the whole thing unfold from eqypt to super-future and see the total outcome, decide its not something you are content with, and repeat it again until you produce a good situation, you save, then you look at that time lines modern day and while there are some differences, due to the innate charachteristics of man/gaia modern society seems oddly non changed. Even though you just spent "A very short time" back in time adjusting.
How long ago were you gone if your friend stands next to you as you start the work but vanishes from your reality because they no longer have a grounding as you are altering the past only to re-apper once you stop altering the past. Were you gone for "10 minutes" or were you gone for the time it took you to travel the time/space distances in your perceptual reality until the proper changes were made?
If its the first one then you maybe able to measure how long Ra was in Egypt. But if the second one is true, in that time is always relative to the observer of time, then you have no way what so ever to truly measure how long Ra was in Egypt for.
We can only say with reasonable accuracy that Ra says it was a "short while". Our sense of time allows no way to really know the length of their subjective visit, and the actual length of their visit. Far as I can tell ofcourse, and I could be wildly wrong.
To the best of my understanding, working with possibility/probability vortices outside of the way we look at time means that they have near while not actual infinite time to stay in Egypt if they want to. Not sure if my understanding and explanation makes sense. It does to me though.
RE: Ra in Egypt - zenmaster - 07-30-2013
(07-26-2013, 04:00 AM)plenum Wrote: Ra chose an incarnate form of interaction with the Egyptians at some stage.Yes.
can we even speculate as to how long they visited for?
(07-26-2013, 04:00 AM)plenum Wrote: this 'short period' ... is it 2 weeks? a month? 3 months?They do not say.
(07-26-2013, 04:00 AM)plenum Wrote: a short period would definitely be less than a year, right?No.