(03-14-2011, 05:39 PM)Ocean Wrote: thanks mods.

a psychic attack?

(03-14-2011, 02:01 PM)Derek Wrote: Obviously at least a psychic attack, if not more than that.

(03-14-2011, 11:40 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote: I do wonder to myself why someone would be attacking David Wilcock's website. Why sort of intentions would someone have removing this content from viewers?

Related topic for discussion: does the fact that David Wilcock is now obviously a target for someone in any way imply validation for his information?

(03-15-2011, 07:59 AM)unity100 Wrote: a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

(03-15-2011, 09:03 AM)Namaste Wrote:

(03-15-2011, 07:59 AM)unity100 Wrote: a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

Quote:62.23 Questioner: Isn’t this unusual that a fifth-density entity then would bother to do this rather than sending a fourth-density servant, shall I say?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. Nearly all positive channels and groups may be lessened in their positivity or rendered quite useless by what we may call the temptations offered by the fourth-density negative thought-forms. They may suggest many distortions towards specific information, towards the aggrandizement of the self, towards the flowering of the organization in some political, social, or fiscal way.

These distortions remove the focus from the One Infinite Source of love and light of which we are all messengers, humble and knowing that we, of ourselves, are but the tiniest portion of the Creator, a small part of a magnificent entirety of infinite intelligence.

(03-15-2011, 10:34 AM)Namaste Wrote: Yes indeed. I remember hearing him channel Ra (Sons of Law of One podcast), and heard a few phrases that David uses himself a lot.

Conscious channeling = flavoured output :¬)

(03-15-2011, 07:16 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: Can someone let me in on the purse thing? I'm lost...

As for the hacking (I don't know how that works either), it's propably an angry fan. Or, since china is being mentioned... He has been trying to promote his website over there recently... A bit of "not on our turf" maybe?

(03-15-2011, 09:03 AM)Namaste Wrote:

(03-15-2011, 07:59 AM)unity100 Wrote: a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

Quote:WHAT, EXACTLY, IS 'EGO' -- AND WHY IS EVERYONE SO HUNG UP ABOUT IT?

The most common attack-word thrown at me is 'ego'.

The basic idea is that feeling positively about yourself, writing articles in first-person tense with stories from your own life's journey, pursuing greater exposure and offering products so you can afford to keep doing your best to reach people, is a bad thing.

If everything I did were free, then we wouldn't be able to function and our service would end.

If I didn't bother to try to spread the word, then many people who might benefit from my work will never hear about it.

And if being 'humble' means that I answer every email I receive, there will be no new material for people to email me about.

It's very easy to pass judgment. It's much more difficult, but far more rewarding, to forgive and accept those who push your buttons the most, realizing that they wouldn't upset you if they didn't remind you of some unhealed aspect within yourself.

(03-15-2011, 09:57 AM)unity100 Wrote:

(03-15-2011, 09:03 AM)Namaste Wrote: [quote='unity100' pid='32072' dateline='1300190399']a lot of circles in conspiracy/new age interest group dislike him for his ego.

His ego comments can be quite endearing (or annoying, depending on your perspective of course!).

On one particular video, he mentions his previous incarnation of Edgar Cayce, saying he doesn't like talking about it, then moves on to explain the similarities between characteristics, his group of friends and the celestial ordering at birth :¬)

To his credit, he always admits that he has an ego, and his own set of challenges.

(03-15-2011, 10:34 AM)Namaste Wrote: Yes indeed. I remember hearing him channel Ra (Sons of Law of One podcast), and heard a few phrases that David uses himself a lot.

Conscious channeling = flavoured output :¬)

Quote:We can, my brother, but it may not be totally sensible. Because of the fact that each individual’s mind works so differently, that when we work in an individual’s mind, it is like learning an entirely new computer system, shall we say. The electrical impulses are not in any two cases formed in the same way. There are minds whose intuition is linked very closely with conscious thought. There are other minds who have almost no memory, but whose day-by-day sensations and thoughts are as clear as a brook and we can use those things. Other minds are wired in such a way that there is a very large amount to retrieve from memory of those things thought and read. This instrument is of that type, which among your peoples would be called intellectual. The only unfortunate thing about this instrument is that her fields of knowledge are not particularly those of the Renaissance person and so many questions go completely from one ear to the other without stopping in any way shape or form. Therefore, we have difficulty.

In each case, we use what there is to use. We begin with a vocabulary that must be the instrument’s, for we give to the instrument only concepts. The instrument must find the words to speak what is given. We also attempt to scan the instrument’s knowledge, books, experiences and thoughts to find the closest to which we would call “enlightenment,” so that we may use certain touchstones within that person’s experience upon which to hang a more complex framework, a more varied tapestry of thoughts.

We do this in order that we may touch as many different minds as possible in whatever size group to which we speak, so that in each mind we have struck a chord which may cause a small transformation in thinking; which may in turn cause a feeling of joy, peace or happiness; which may in turn cause each person to seek. Our desire is to challenge your desire.

Thus, we start with the instrument and we proceed therefrom, touching with the instrument’s mind again, and then again, as we scan—we will correct this instrument—as we scan the minds of those within the circle to find what they may wish to listen to.

May we answer you further, my brother?

(03-15-2011, 04:53 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: Hackers. This is about hackers.

David rubbs on a lot of people. He admits to receiving hate mail. Those people think he has an ego, and that's what is mentioned here.

David has put out a lot of free stuff that is very very interesting and thought provoking. I have no idea about what he produces for profit. I've never sent him a dime. His free videos are directly linked to me writing in this forum. Even so, I know he is in no way perfect.

Quote:Good stuff! Thank you guys for sharing your opinions. It's interesting that Jesus taught love and forgiveness of others, and yet most of the hate-mail I receive uses a select interpretation of Jesus' teachings as a foundation to unleash a torrent of hate.

I never reply to these letters but they are always good for a few laughs. I can't dislike these people because I know I am not the person they think they're writing to.

----------

I've been writing about this stuff for a decade and have never once been harassed, other than having an obvious phone-tap for 2-3 years after I called the FBI to report a psychic vision of a potential nuclear attack against New York City in 1998.

I found out later on that my prophecy accurately described a well-known and very real threat, and that's why they bothered me -- they wanted to know how I knew. Eventually they gave up.