Quote:1.7 ▶ Questioner: [The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.]

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.

In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

(08-12-2018, 02:42 PM)peregrine Wrote: It would seem to moi that to explore the questions posed in the OP, one would first have to define Creator and then define self.

Is the Creator a thing that can take you to lunch and talk over your spiritual career plans?  Does it have a sense of self solid enough to support an agenda or goals of any sort?

(08-12-2018, 08:35 AM)loostudent Wrote: What is the nature of this interaction?

Is the Creator just providing the illusion, natural laws, potentials and ground of existence and expirience or is it also interfering with expiriential nexus and engaged in cultivating the Creation?

Is Creator's interaction direct or is it limited to intermidiaries (co-Creators)?

Is it self-initiated or is it depending on the initative of self-conscious created beings?

(08-12-2018, 02:42 PM)peregrine Wrote: It would seem to moi that to explore the questions posed in the OP, one would first have to define Creator and then define self.

Is the Creator a thing that can take you to lunch and talk over your spiritual career plans?  Does it have a sense of self solid enough to support an agenda or goals of any sort?

Personally, since you asked, I doubt any of that is true.  I doubt the Creator is a thing with any kind of selfhood.

What is it then, some sort of robot?  I doubt that, too.  

I know the term "The Creator" sounds like a functionary's office or title, but I think that may be misleading.  I picture the Creator as more elemental than the elements, as it were, more fundamental than existence.  It is implicit in all that has form and its nature, in the realm of form, is to gather bits together to form structure and narrative.

And what are you?  You are a gathering of a few bits to form a slight structure and a brief narrative.  But inside of that is the implicit Creator thing that is.......well....... you can take it from here............


They don't call it a mystery for nuthin'.