![]() |
In regards to eating meat - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Healing (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=45) +---- Forum: Health & Diet (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +---- Thread: In regards to eating meat (/showthread.php?tid=239) |
RE: In regards to eating meat - BrownEye - 12-11-2011 It is a natural use of a sensory system. Some folks will have senses that work better, or is more (sense)itive than others. Kind of like some can see auras while most can't. That is not a symptom. Rather the "not" sensing is a symptom of modern civilized lifestyle/belief. I guess from your viewpoint "seeing" is also a symptom. And that any input through a sense organ is classified as a symptom? As an experiment place your bed against a wall with your fridge or main power in on the other side of that wall. Then ask yourself (why the electromagnetic field of her body is not powerful enough to mitigate the effects of the negative external fields) RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 11:47 AM)Pickle Wrote: It is a natural use of a sensory system. Some folks will have senses that work better, or is more (sense)itive than others. Pickle... believe whatever you want. No... actually I don't, and wouldn't sleep with my head near a strong EMF, as comes from an alarm clock or electrical outlet. No, I wouldn't spend hours a day with a cell phone pressed up against my skull. I am actually well aware of the real risks of EMF. I stand by my statement. If a person's system goes all haywire because they are standing near their home computer... that is a symptom of the body. Not the computer. Sitting in a large computer lab all night under fluorescent lights writing a term paper is a different scenario. I see no reason to take such an EXTREME view on all these things. Golly gee willikers, Pickle! How can you sleep at night? We can't eat the food. We can't drink the water. We can't breathe the air. EMFs are killing us. Fluoride is killing us. GMOs are killing us. Pharmaceuticals are killing us. Charred burgers are killing us. It goes on FOREVER! 1. We are still here. 2. The point of physicality isn't to "live forever". That's pretty much my view in a nutshell. I honor and respect your path. But I do not choose it. What I -am- choosing is to no longer engage with you on health or scientific matters. You are apparently convinced that you "already know" everything there is to know on fringe health topics, and have arrived at the unshakeable conclusion that the most EXTREME reaction to all these things is the appropriate response. After a certain point, the fear one feels toward all these things is more destructive to body, and to the soul, than the things themselves. RE: In regards to eating meat - Diana - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 12:20 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(12-11-2011, 11:47 AM)Pickle Wrote: It is a natural use of a sensory system. Some folks will have senses that work better, or is more (sense)itive than others. We are at a precarious point in human history where our technology does not line up with our integrity, consciousness, and spirituality (for lack of a better word). The things mentioned above--fluoride, GMOs, polluted air and water, etc--are definitely causing harm to not only us, but other life forms as well. So in that sense, they are killing us. For my part, I try and maximize my potential health on all levels, knowing they are all affecting each other. There are different ways to see this issue: from the standpoint of the body, and from the standpoint of a larger view of existence. Here is a scenario to ponder: A very advanced physical being from an advanced balanced society (one that has mastered and moved on from our technological challenges, and who considers all life forms in its construction) visits us. What might this entity think of the way we live, considering the items mentioned above, and in this thread (meat, broadcasting frequencies, etc.)? RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-11-2011 (12-10-2011, 11:06 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Quote:Interestingly, one of the raw vegan gurus recently ran an article in which he totally blasted the enzyme philosophy. Sure, with the disclaimer that I don't agree with everything this guy says. He's got a lot of great info, but is what I'd consider a 'purist' and is very, very rigid and dogmatic in his opinions. Same with his wife. They claim to be open-minded but are quick to condemn a lot of things before they've done their due diligence. (As you can quickly see in this example.) I was actually impressed when they recently stated that parents aren't committing an unforgiveable sin if they feed their young children a bit of cooked vegan food! I actually quit reading their newsletter for awhile because I got tired of being told that so many foods were 'bad'. Can't have onions. Can't have garlic. Can't have spices. Bleh! There seemed to be more emphasis on what not to do, instead of what to do. In all fairness, they seem to have now loosened up their stance considerably, so I've resumed reading their blogs. Ironically, in this particular blog they are the ones on the defensive from their purist fanbase! I don't want to over-analyze them, but just want to make the point that there are many raw vegan 'gurus' out there, so please don't judge the whole movement based on just this one. http://www.fredericpatenaude.com/blog/?p=2036 RE: In regards to eating meat - _X7 - 12-11-2011 Pickle, regarding the frequency of power grids.... It was in 1888 that Niagra Falls was tapped to power Buffalo, NY close by, using AC power instead of rope pulleys. At that time 60 cps was a great trade off to avoid flickering lights, provide efficient transformers and motors given very limited facilities (like belt-pulley mills etc). It is certainly true that Tesla wrote of and invented high frequency systems, but we all know that the banker cults refused to upgrade power grids. Which today are still much the same principle in technological aspects, to the 1888 beginnings. EMF smog is somewhat like a neighbor playing music too loudly or otherwise broadcasting bad emotional vibrations. Second hand smoke is unhealthy, yet some folks live through old age regardless. Some of us are able to maintain equilibrium regardless of interferences, others not. The benefits of 60hz likely far outweigh the hazards. Yet much better health can be obtained with a few simple measures and common sense. Try helping young people concerning these issues? Ya, it is almost impossible. RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-11-2011 ***THIS JUST IN***
My partner relates to me the story of a man in her yoga class today. 17 years ago he was diagnosed with colon cancer. Had it removed. Since then, he has been living a "pure" lifestyle, including a "clean" diet and practicing yoga regularly. He just found out that the cancer returned. ![]() What do you guys think? EMFs? Not enough colonics? Or maybe did he never take care of the underlying problem, thinking that diet, exercise, and faith would be sufficient? What does that say for his guru or practitioner who may have encouraged him to take on such an attitude? RE: In regards to eating meat - Diana - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 04:53 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: I think he did not address all levels of his health. If he focused on the physical only, without addressing unresolved anger issues for instance, the problem would return. Only he is responsible for his health. Whatever a guru or practitioner says, he is the one who makes the decisions about his health, and that must require his participation, not his blind following of said advice. There is no magic bullet. We must all individually assess on all levels our states of being. Practitioners are part of our information system. As for gurus, I don't hold with following anybody. RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 05:21 PM)Diana Wrote: Only he is responsible for his health. Whatever a guru or practitioner says, he is the one who makes the decisions about his health, and that must require his participation, not his blind following of said advice. What if the guru/practitioner used misinformation, coercion, or manipulative sales tactics in order to "convert" this person to their distorted views? No karma incurred there? Clear conscience for those folks? Any negative effect on polarization, do you think? (12-11-2011, 01:05 PM)Diana Wrote: A very advanced physical being from an advanced balanced society (one that has mastered and moved on from our technological challenges, and who considers all life forms in its construction) visits us. What might this entity think of the way we live, considering the items mentioned above, and in this thread (meat, broadcasting frequencies, etc.)? Interesting to ponder. I wonder if such a being would feel personally threatened by all these things, and to what degree they would encourage us to focus on longevity at this nexus. Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The harvest is now. There is not at this time any reason to include efforts along these distortions toward longevity, but rather to encourage distortions toward seeking the heart of self, for this which resides clearly in the violet-ray energy field will determine the harvesting of each mind/body/spirit complex. Quote:Questioner: Is that the secret of longevity and perhaps even immortality or a long life of the body, a conscious spiritual … meditation or … of the spiritual mind and the DNA genetic code … Quote:Questioner: (Inaudible). RE: In regards to eating meat - BrownEye - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 12:20 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Pickle... believe whatever you want. No... actually I don't, and wouldn't sleep with my head near a strong EMF, as comes from an alarm clock or electrical outlet. No, I wouldn't spend hours a day with a cell phone pressed up against my skull. I prefer the natural beauty of a fully healthy and perfect woman. Not the type that needs to put on a mask, put on an act, rely on drugs and technology to offset an imbalance as a result of moving away from nature. The shunning of nature in order to embrace techology has been done on other planets as we already know. (12-11-2011, 02:30 PM)_X7 Wrote: Pickle, regarding the frequency of power grids....I know what history tends to portray. If you connect to any of your guides, or your oversoul, or even source(rare) you can ask about events in history. While the tracks of a train really were based on the measurements of a horses ass, the decisions on 60hz were largely chosen as to what the effect would be on the public. There are other fully useable frequencies that are nowhere near as harmful to us. And you will find in those early days they experimented with a full range of frequencies and the effect on the organism. (12-11-2011, 04:53 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: What caused the cancer to begin with? I can harbor dark energy in a specific organ, eventually causing cancer. After treatment, I can eat right, exercise, even do yoga, but if I continue to store dark energy in that same organ it will become cancerous yet again. Every nerve ending is for sensory experience. One of the persons experiences is not assimilating in a positive manner, not keeping to perfect homeostasis. Then also, the person may not have the right diet to offset the past damage. ...........an example would be myself having damaged my pancreas from my early habits. I can bring it back to full function quicker if I was to be more disciplined than I am, which would not be very easy with a daily job. Or I can just maintain cleanliness and wait for the system to repair itself at a slower rate, without having to inconvenience my schedule. (12-10-2011, 09:32 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(12-09-2011, 01:26 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Well, I certainly might be making things up in my mind about that. I will say that it appears to me that if I said the sky was blue, certain individuals would feel compelled to call it green. Not you. Also, I am saying this in the broader context of this forum, rather than just this specific thread. My eyes do not see radiating wavelengths the same as my wife. What appears to be a green light to me is a blue light to my wife. The orange and yellow are iffy too. Doesn't really have a whole lot of effect on a person unless they were wearing the color itself. (12-11-2011, 01:05 PM)Diana Wrote: Here is a scenario to ponder: This has already happened. We still have a quarantine LMAO! I don't think we will be allowed to destroy other planets beyond this one. At least not until we destroy this one first, then we will be moved to the next one in line. ![]() RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 04:53 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: My partner relates to me the story of a man in her yoga class today. 17 years ago he was diagnosed with colon cancer. Had it removed. Since then, he has been living a "pure" lifestyle, including a "clean" diet and practicing yoga regularly. Well first of all, if he managed to stay cancer-free for 17 years - 17 years!!! - that's pretty damn good! Statistically, those who choose conventional cancer 'treatments' (sic) typically have a recurrence within, what, 5 years? And between 5 and 10 years, their mortality rate is no better than those who did...nothing. So already, if this guy remained cancer-free for a whopping 17 years, then WOW, that's impressive! I'd consider that a success, not a failure. Now, as far as why the cancer returned, it's impossible for any of us to say, not knowing all the details, and even if we did know all the details, we still couldn't. Cancer is a very complex issue, with many contributing factors. I agree with both Diana and Pickle...maybe he didn't resolve the root issue...maybe he had underlying anger issues that were never resolved. Or, maybe he did resolve them, but later fell into the trap of new issues! Like, maybe he was angry at his first wife, forgave her, then later his 2nd wife cheated on him and he fell back into the same anger pattern. Who knows? It's not just about diet and exercise! Furthermore, just how 'healthy' was his diet anyway? It's amazing how some people claim to have a 'healthy' diet just because they eat lots of chicken instead of beef! Where did he live? Maybe he was exposed to environmental toxins. It's been proven that there are increased incidences of cancer in certain areas due to chemical spills and stuff like that. Did he buy all organic? What kind of pesticides were used on the produce he consumed? What kind of water did he drink? Water alone can make a person acidic, and cancer thrives in an acidic environment. Maybe he just seemed to have a healthy lifestyle, but was a closet methhead or junkie. Who knows? Maybe he was nice on the surface but in private was a rageaholic. Or maybe he had suffered an extreme trauma in the last few years which never got healed, and the cancer came back in the area he was weak in. Or maybe he even got cocky about having defeated cancer, and it came back as catalyst to get him to have more compassion on those still struggling with it. Who knows? There could be any number of explanations. There is no magic cure for cancer and it's impossible to analyze it even with full knowledge, much less so with nearly zero knowledge. I've met women who healed themselves from advanced stage breast cancer by going raw vegan and doing lots of juicing and sprouting. I also knew a woman who did all the 'right' things - juicing, wheatgrass, etc. - but even on her deathbed still had a lot of unresolved anger towards her husband, as well as unresolved grief at having lost a baby (who, incidentally, died while suckling the very same breast that later got the cancer). Clearly, in that case, all the wheatgrass juice in the world wasn't going to help her. She never got to the root issue. Her 'guru' (a Christian pastor who happens to have been the same person who told me to drink distilled water forever) meant well but was very controlling. She took it upon herself to dictate what the poor woman was to do. I watched all this in horror. It seemed not much better than a mainstream doctor insisting that she do chemo! Why? Because the sick woman wasn't given much opportunity to find her own strength. She was just tossed around from the doctor to the pastor. The pastor even said one time that there was "a lot riding on getting this woman healed" which I found nauseating - she and the other pastor had big plans of announcing that all their prayer had 'worked'. It would have been a feather in their caps, for sure. After the woman died, the pastor preached at her funeral that the Christians had 'failed' to heal her. Apparently they hadn't prayed hard enough! Sadly, this woman has become a statistic of "vegan diet and juicing failed." So you just never know what's going on behind the scenes. To assume that this man's 'healthy' diet and lifestyle failed him, is to oversimplify. His diet might not have been so healthy, and/or there might have been many other factors we don't know about. RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 08:26 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: ... Right! I agree with what you said, but I think it was a bit off point. Quote:So you just never know what's going on behind the scenes. To assume that this man's 'healthy' diet and lifestyle failed him, is to oversimplify. His diet might not have been so healthy, and/or there might have been many other factors we don't know about. I didn't mean that diet and exercise failed- I meant that it wasn't enough. True, I don't actually know the particular details of this man's story. I was just using it as an example of a case where somebody ate right, exercised, and still got cancer. Again. The broader context of sharing the story was in the discussion of the potential for harm which comes out of taking an oversimplistic approach to health, and the potential for incurred karma on the part of those who self-righteously steer others down the wrong path where their health is concerned. But no, I am not so much willing to accept recurrence of colon cancer in a 40-ish year old man to be a "success". I see it as a failure of several systems. First and foremost, a failure of the conventional health care system. But also of the systems of yoga which tend to promote this attitude that all we need to do is keep "purifying" the body and it will stay young and healthy. It is irresponsible, all around. Even more so to the degree that certain (not all) forms of yoga appear to be Trojan horses for Jainism. At least with an MD you know what you are getting. RE: In regards to eating meat - BrownEye - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 08:26 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote: There could be any number of explanations. There is no magic cure for cancer and it's impossible to analyze it even with full knowledge, much less so with nearly zero knowledge.Found this in my travels some time ago. Quoted it to a friend I was helping with comprehension. For some reason it does not come up in a search and I can't get the rest of the text or the link. It caught my eye since it matched the point of awareness that I had reached about the amount of control we actually have over the machine that we call our body. Self awareness or conscious awareness of the body itself, your connection to "it", and what you can do with it. While you have large control (if soul allows) of gene switching, we are still forced to build/rebuild the body with correct parts. Certain of the children who had full blown AIDS and have been found to be free of the disease are Shift children who don’t want anything to do with the AIDS journey. They came into this plane of consciousness to check out the journey and then get right out of here. So they programmed this journey to get AIDS, but then they found that they liked it here. They thought, “Wow, this is really great.” So they clicked off the gene. In Signature Cell Healing, you learn about clicking genes on and off, and other such things. These are things a Shift child can do. Some of these children are clicking off the AIDS gene completely and some are clicking it off just enough to give you something to work with. Their journey is mind-boggling. They will teach you how to turn off cancer genes, AIDS RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-11-2011 (12-11-2011, 09:59 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: I never said that diet and exercise failed- I said that it wasn't enough. Well that's the same thing I said, essentially. ![]() (12-11-2011, 09:59 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: True, I don't actually know the particular details of this man's story. I was just using it as an example of a case where somebody ate right, exercised, and still got cancer. I agree with the greater point that there are other factors at play. My additional point is that we really don't know whether he 'ate right' and in fact can't even agree on what 'eating right' even is! (12-11-2011, 09:59 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: The broader context of sharing the story was in the discussion of the potential for harm which comes out of taking an oversimplistic approach to health, and the potential for incurred karma on the part of those who self-righteously steer others down the wrong path where their health is concerned. I agree on that point. The flip side of that is that sometimes practitioners can make it all too complicated. (12-11-2011, 09:59 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: But no, I am not so much willing to accept recurrence of colon cancer in a 40-ish year old man to be a "success". I was speaking in relative terms, compared to conventional expectations of mainstream medicine. Hey check this out! Self-sufficiency in the city RE: In regards to eating meat - Diana - 12-12-2011 (12-11-2011, 05:37 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(12-11-2011, 05:21 PM)Diana Wrote: Only he is responsible for his health. Whatever a guru or practitioner says, he is the one who makes the decisions about his health, and that must require his participation, not his blind following of said advice. A guru/practitioner may very well incur karma from manipulation and coercion. The person who is sick, and seeking information, must still decide what to do with that information. There are 2 sides to an equation: allopathic doctors giving out medications pushed by the pharmaceutical companies, and, the people who take the medications without questioning them or the doctor. Health gurus selling their books, supplements, and programs, and, the people who blindly follow without researching and educating themselves on the validity and efficacy of the product. There are no victims in the equation. RE: In regards to eating meat - _X7 - 12-12-2011 (12-11-2011, 11:36 AM)Pickle Wrote:(12-11-2011, 06:03 AM)_X7 Wrote: The struggle for human-energizing has always been the largest effect of all visible effects in the occupied world. If you provide direct references or key words, that could help understanding the assertions you suggest. In searching frequency history, these engineering people have much to say regarding grid-frequency-history:http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=159635 Indeed, frequencies varied more than my expectation, but not due to health effects. For health, we might look to Followers of Royal Rife, who might possibly be the leading legend concerning healthy frequencies. There is little there which proves conclusive or adamant. Perhaps it is balanced or neutral, on google, so far. Besides, power-grids have a new frequency components, in the form of dirty power and other frequencies, on top of the baseline. Todays electronic devices, whether battery or grid powered, output far more questionable and also somewhat proven EMF harms. The frequencies involved vary. Exposures can be addressed by prudent people, who bother to study the subjects. I certainly would agree that authoritarian-medicine is failing in so many regards such as new health risks. RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-13-2011 Interesting tidbit... doing some personal research I just came across the source of this famous quote. I didn't know before that it is said to have originated with Imhotep... whom I understand to be a contactee of Ra during the latter component of the pyramid building phase 8500 - 4500 years ago, when they openly walked with humanity. I base this conjecture on the following quote: 23.6 Wrote:Questioner: Then at this time you did not contact them. Can you answer the same question that I just asked with respect to your next attempt to contact the Egyptians? Now... here is a little blurb on Imhotep: http://www.chemistrydaily.com/chemistry/Imhotep Quote:Imhotep (sometimes spelled Ȧmhotep or Ii-em-Hotep, Egyptian ii-m-ḥtp) is the first architect and physician known by name to written history. He is also considered to be the world's first known genius. As the Pharaoh Djosèr's Vizier, he designed the Pyramid of Djzosèr at Saqqara in Egypt around 2630-2611 BC, during the 3rd Dynasty. Now here is the quote: Imhotep Wrote:Eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we shall die. Just a little something that I thought was an interesting tidbit to gnaw on! RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-13-2011 Crow and Dog playing ball Crow loves my Dog Dog tending Chick Smart Cow Another Smart Cow And yet another Smart Cow Oh gosh I keep finding MORE Smart Cows! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eb7vsurZ8U&feature=related Calf and Dog Best Friends Amazing Pig plays fetch, basketball, puts away his toys and other tricks Some would say this is still exploitation, but I disagree. It's education about how smart pigs are. These performing pigs have a much better life than the alternative. Performing Pigs RE: In regards to eating meat - Whitefeather - 12-14-2011 (12-08-2011, 12:22 AM)Oceania Wrote: ok well they went straight to showing pictures of stuff i dun wanna see. I agree with Oceania. I was going through the thread and Monica, you said it was 'amazing' and 'wow' so I clicked on the link. Huuu! It is a video only for insensitive people. I know that some people may think that it is a good thing to getting used to be insensitive but I disagree with that ... ![]() RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-14-2011 (12-14-2011, 03:07 AM)Whitefeather Wrote: I agree with Oceania. I was going through the thread and Monica, you said it was 'amazing' and 'wow' so I clicked on the link. Huuu! It is a video only for insensitive people. I know that some people may think that it is a good thing to getting used to be insensitive but I disagree with that ... I'm stunned, actually. I'm very, very, verrrrrrrrry sensitive to slaughterhouse video footage, to the point of feeling nauseous and depressed, and having horrible nightmares afterwards. But I have, at times, forced myself to watch the worst of the videos, because I wanted to know just how bad it was, so that I could try to do something about it. It's a testament to just how horrible slaughterhouses are, if you found that video harsh. It was extremely tame in comparison to what I've seen. The footage I've seen, is the stuff of nightmares. And it goes on every day, for billions of animals, many who are as smart as our dogs. For them, the nightmare never ends. The photos of animal suffering were not what I was referring to when I said the video was amazing. Photos of animal suffering can never be amazing! What was amazing about that video was the results the campaign got. People who were unfazed by photos of animal cruelty, were going vegetarian after being shown that baby pigs are just as cute as puppies, and chicks just as cute as kittens. What was amazing was the brilliance of whoever came up with that idea, of appealing to people's natural love for cute furry animals, instead of hoping to stir compassion in them by showing them graphic images of violence to animals. The graphic images didn't work very well. The cutesy images of piglets did work. What matters is that it worked. THAT is what I found amazing. And I feel so strongly of the importance of this campaign, that I was able to put the 27 seconds of graphic images aside. They were so very mild, anyway, compared to what I've seen. In courtrooms, images of the victims are shown to the jurors. For a reason. They must face the reality of the crime, in order to reach a fair verdict. I was certainly not suggesting that anyone become insensitive to graphic images of violence to animals! On the contrary; animal activists hope that seeing such images will help open people's hearts and help them become more sensitive, and hopefully quit contributing to such atrocities. I've actually refrained from posting any truly graphic videos of slaughterhouse cruelty. There are plenty of far worse footage that I could have posted, but didn't. This one was so very very mild in comparison, that I truly didn't expect that it would disturb anyone. And, I contend that its redeeming value far outweighs its disturbing qualities. We cannot escape the disturbing aspects of the meat industry. Well, on second thought, people can and do escape it all the time. But this particular campaign isn't seeking to gloss over it. (Atrocities should never be glossed over.) They're just going about it in a much milder, less in-your-face way. And it's working. I'm very excited about the fact that it's working. Note: I added a disclaimer to my original post. Vegetarians Have Less Risk for Diverticulitis RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-14-2011 Where's the beef? Not in Bill Clinton's diet. Quote:The former president, known for his love of burgers, barbecue and junk food, has gone from a meat lover to a vegan, the strictest form of a vegetarian diet. He says he eats fruits, vegetables and beans, but no red meat, chicken or dairy. RE: In regards to eating meat - Diana - 12-14-2011 It is becoming evident, even to the mainstream, that animals are intelligent. Pigs are extremely intelligent, for instance. And it's apparent that animals have feelings--emotional feelings. I will preface by saying that all life is equal and equally sacred. Given that it's evident plants cannot have the fear level of animals--and if anyone would like me to summarize why I would be happy to--and that it is not necessary to take animal life, then why would a person want to? There are many great points in this thread about ecosystems, sustainable farming, health, and much more. But why would any person want to eat meat if they did not need to? Some peoples on the planet may be forced to eat animals. But what if you are not forced? I am not trying to convert anyone, just trying to understand ![]() RE: In regards to eating meat - BrownEye - 12-14-2011 My wife is 36 years old and has always known pigs to be as intelligent as dogs. Pigs are known for eating almost anything. I bet we get that ability from our pig dna ha ha. RE: In regards to eating meat - BrownEye - 12-15-2011 Quote:More than 50 years ago, scientists painted the skin of mice with extracts from heated animal muscle and found that the extracts were carcinogenic, but the research went no further.https://www.llnl.gov/str/FoodSection1.html RE: In regards to eating meat - Zachary - 12-17-2011 I am still not sure how I feel on the subject. I am kind of in the middle of experiencing the two polar opposites as far as diet goes...im expecting to find balance soon. I was a vegetarian for about 4 months straight. I felt lighter physically and spiritually but also had a lower energy level as well as a lower sex drive. ^lesson learned: If your going to be a vegetarian DO IT RIGHT or eat meat...because doing it wrong is just not worth it...If I am going to become one again I will make sure I can consistently pull off eating the right foods. Right now I am living in Costa Rica with a family here. I have very little money to spend so I pay them ten bucks a week for meals. They mostly eat rice and beans in the morning rice and beans with meat for lunch (maybe some fruit and veggies) rice and beans with meat at night. Talk about a dead diet right? not digging it too much but what I am digging is all the muscle I've put back on since eating meat. I have a way better energy level now. But I feel heavy and my thoughts seem more prone to becoming violent (in certain situations) now that I am eating all this meat again. So right now since I dont see myself being able to pull off a proper vegetarian diet in the future...I will strive (for now) to eat maybe 80% veggies 20% meat (possibly 70/30). My meat source would, ideally, only be fish...I might do chicken as well. I think a good mindset is: if you can't kill the animal yourself...don't eat it. I would NOT want to kill a chicken. I dont even like killing fish but I will if necessary because I recognize the need to love my body. RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-17-2011 (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: I was a vegetarian for about 4 months straight. I felt lighter physically and spiritually but also had a lower energy level as well as a lower sex drive. My husband hasn't had any issues with that. ![]() And his energy is better since he quit meat altogether. But granted, he does juicing and bluegreen algae! (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: ^lesson learned: If your going to be a vegetarian DO IT RIGHT or eat meat...because doing it wrong is just not worth it...If I am going to become one again I will make sure I can consistently pull off eating the right foods. That sounds like good advice! (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: Talk about a dead diet right? not digging it too much but what I am digging is all the muscle I've put back on since eating meat. There's no question that meat can put on muscle. But hey, check this out! I think you will find this very intersting! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbEUHCU_GtM This guy lives on a shoestring, and manages to do it. And check out those muscles! (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: I have a way better energy level now. But I feel heavy and my thoughts seem more prone to becoming violent (in certain situations) now that I am eating all this meat again. Interesting... (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: So right now since I dont see myself being able to pull off a proper vegetarian diet in the future...I will strive (for now) to eat maybe 80% veggies 20% meat (possibly 70/30). My meat source would, ideally, only be fish...I might do chicken as well. I've heard of a lot of people moving to Costa Rica because of the abundance or cheap, fresh fruits and veggies. Maybe there is a way to use some of that food budget to include more fresh produce...? (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: I think a good mindset is: if you can't kill the animal yourself...don't eat it. That sounds like a great principle to live by! Thanks for sharing! ![]() RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-17-2011 From the Aaron/Q'uo Dialogues, on the topic of food in fourth density: A/Q Session 26 Wrote:Aaron: I want to speak to this term "harvest" and what it means. This is a word that is often used. Perhaps you flinch at the term and your energy quails because the word implies force to you, in that someone goes out into a field and harvests the grain and fruit to take it for its own, as if the grain or fruit were being used or manipulated. Think of the small energy than moved into that stalk of wheat and into that apple or bean. When energy moves into that which is used on this plane as food for others, its greatest will, at whatever level it is conscious, is to learn how to offer its energy to others in becoming part of the greatness that is universal consciousness. When you pick and apple from a tree and express gratitude for the nourishment and sweetness of that fruit, it honors the apple's greatest joy, which is to serve. Its free will is not being violated by being plucked to be eaten. If it did not want to be eaten it would have invented blemishes of one sort or another that would make it unappealing. The richer it appears and the more vibrant its energy fiels, the more it wishes to offer itself and to make itself attractive. RE: In regards to eating meat - Monica - 12-17-2011 Thanks for sharing this quote, Tenet! Hey here it is again, about Earth becoming 4D: Quote:I spoke yesterday of the move of Earth from third to fourth density. RE: In regards to eating meat - Diana - 12-17-2011 (12-17-2011, 01:29 AM)zackw419 Wrote: Talk about a dead diet right? not digging it too much but what I am digging is all the muscle I've put back on since eating meat. I have a way better energy level now. But I feel heavy and my thoughts seem more prone to becoming violent (in certain situations) now that I am eating all this meat again. I mentioned this previously, but I have a friend who used to be a professional wrestler (WWF). He is a raw-fooder for many years. I was at the gym with him when everybody stopped to watch him bench press 300 pounds (I think that was the weight). So it's not impossible to build muscle on a vegetarian diet. It may be due to individual requirements that we are different, but it also may be due to belief systems. If we believe that meat puts on muscle, then the body will follow. If we believe vegetarians are skinny and pale (I have heard this said--or something similar countless times) then the body will follow. Also, as you indicate, the meat comes with a vibration. There is a lot to consider. And I remember the rice and beans, rice and beans, in Costa Rica, which I was grateful for being vegetarian. Beautiful country. I might suggest that you find a local farm, or just someone with a backyard coop, where you can get fresh eggs from free range chickens. There is a friend who lives near me who has just a few chickens that produce a lot of eggs. Eggs are a great, potent source of protein. The other suggestion is, you could pot some plants such as tomatoes and just grow them yourself to get some live food in your diet ![]() RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-17-2011 (12-17-2011, 02:08 PM)Diana Wrote: And I remember the rice and beans, rice and beans, in Costa Rica, which I was grateful for being vegetarian. Beautiful country. If you ever get back to Costa Rica, there is a biodynamic farm- Finca Luna Nueva- that you would probably love! RE: In regards to eating meat - Tenet Nosce - 12-17-2011 Just came across this interesting quote from Session 17. It seems like a lot of disagreements over the material trace back to this particular session in one way or another. 17.17 Wrote:Ra: I am Ra. We may describe in general what occurred. The technique was that of building upon other negatively oriented information. This information had been given by the one whom your peoples called “Yahweh.” This information involved many strictures upon behavior and promised power of the third-density, service-to-self nature. These two types of distortions were impressed upon those already oriented to think these thought-forms. This sounds to me exactly like the notion of taking on extreme ascetic practices in order to gain supernatural powers. This also gets back to some of that stuff in the Essene depictions of Jesus' words. I liked some parts, but as a whole, the document was riddled with behavior restrictions and "Thou shalt nots..." ![]() |