+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? (/showthread.php?tid=15674)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? - Infinite - 05-10-2018
I found a very important answer of Latwii:
Quote:Carla: Could you give a subjective opinion as to the degree of distortion from the information Ra might give which would be present in information from L/Leema? In other words, how watered-down or distorted would this information be?
I am Latwii, and we find that this query is one with variable possibilities of response due to the factors which would comprise each session. These factors would be variable according to the entities present, their interest in this kind of information, the general level of vital energy, of all present for the session and the preparations in the way of study, shall we say, that had gone into the, shall we say, mental and emotional computations prior to the sessions. In general, we may suggest that the degree of accuracy that could be hoped for would be seventy-five to eighty percent in relation to the accuracy that was achieved in the contact with those known as Ra.
That's a good percent for me. I believe that Q'uo informations are less distorted than Latwii.
RE: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? - Sacred Fool - 05-11-2018
(05-10-2018, 09:50 PM)Infinite Wrote: I found a very important answer of Latwii:
I certainly got the impression, reading through the L/L transcripts, that the quality of sessions was variable due to the factors mentioned supra. Not that the information was necessarily distorted in terms of accuracy, but that it was sometimes more incisive and meaningful, while other times being fluffier. And, having worked with various psychics over the years, I've found that to be a general truism: what you get out of a session is directly proportional to how deeply you can open yourself to yourself to ask and receive. (And the same would apply to how much you get out of reading the material.) No secret there, but the ability to go deeply into that is a skill that is hard to define and maybe not so easy to practice.
By the way, the comment was made earlier by Aion that perceived purity is a function of personal resonance. While that may be true to some extent--and confirmation bias should never be underestimated--the degree to which a speaker or a printed material can match the depth of one's perceived opening to self is, I would argue, a valid measure of relative purity. If the speaker or material cannot match my level of openness to self, I walk on, and I don't think that's purely a measure of my bias, but of my perception of the speaker's skill level.
RE: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? - Turtle - 05-12-2018
(05-04-2018, 08:55 AM)Infinite Wrote: I was thinking about that. For almost ten years I have been studying metaphysical philosophies and fringe subjects as Theosophy, Gnosis, secret societies, ufology, channelings, occultism, esoterism, etc. The LOO is the purest source I ever found. The concepts of "density", STO/STS and Harvest are the most complete spiritual view I ever found. Why is L/L Research group so "especial"? Few groups come close to the purity of this group.
Simple. The group did their homework and were diligent and disciplined in their efforts. It's no different than asking the question, "Why is a bodybuilder much more muscular than a marathon runner?" lol
RE: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? - Agua - 06-16-2018
removed
RE: Why is LOO the purest spiritual source? - unity100 - 06-16-2018
There are reasons pertaining to the intense preparation and effort that went into preparing Ra contact, involving many incarnations (possibly more than one group like LL) by the away-team and involving an unknown amount of effort on Ra and confederation's side to find, nurture and select a group and then to maintain the contact.
But beyond these, Ra material is the most direct source, unmodified to accommodate the contemporary sentiments of the society and the particular audience which it was intended for, and it is untainted and unmodified by the contemporary or ancient beliefs or biases of current society or earlier societies.
To illustrate simply, if you check any other major channeling material that is popular today, you will see those traits:
Ramtha talks a lot about popular contemporary stuff, considerable religious motifs mixed in - and that is taking out the obvious evidently-tainted stuff like King Kull like atlantis stories and whatnot.
Silver Birch is very, very spiritual. It has a lot of plainly explained and told spiritual examples, lessons and cases, a lot of explained concepts. But it is quite congruent with the old-school spiritualist school that descends from the early 19th century roots. Its quite mystical and, well, 'spiritual' to put it in a way.
Bartholomew is what many people who need acceptance, validation and self esteem, need. Its all about providing 4d energy to those who need it.
Cayce is questionable in that its hard to say that it is a channeled material, for majority of his work is about diagnosing the ailments of people and suggesting treatment. But among these many diagnosis, a lot of spiritual info about the workings of evolution of spirits, their successes and their issues come up as well. Including voluminous amount of historical information. However, it is also colored a lot by the religious beliefs of Cayce himself.
...........
Compared to all of these Ra material is just how things are. Ask something, and the answer is there, clean, clear, direct and blunt. You may like the answer or not. You may understand it or not. You may agree with it or not... It is what it is.
Its untainted and non-colored by any bias, religious or cultural. Some concepts that are used to explain some things are not even known in the contemporary civilization, or are known by very few amount of people (scientists, researches of very particular fields) who may not even have any interest in spiritualist material.
Thanks to the group's work, its well organized as well. It starts from how things start, moves onto history, moves on to how existence works, moves on to contemporary stuff, to near future, and to how things will end (and restart), and then dives into the actual 'secrets' of existing like the archetypes.
One of the best sides is that you can confirm, understand and learn a lot of things by just observing the existing world. By observing current social dynamics or historical dynamics, one can easily observe mechanics of positive and negative conduct, their evolution. Merely by observing people in daily life, one can learn and understand a lot of things about chakras, energies, how these play in interactions of people - from blockages leading to behavioral deviations to the issues and the brilliance those with clear energy centers can manifest.
There is a lot that can be yet told about the usefulness and clarity of this material. I will take this opportunity to stop at this juncture.