Bring4th
The mysterious nature of time - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: The mysterious nature of time (/showthread.php?tid=2614)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558


RE: The mysterious nature of time - AnthroHeart - 11-20-2014

Confused, most of the time you are in such a good mood. I'm getting that way.
It's better than it used to be.

Yay, page 100.

(11-20-2014, 12:49 PM)Confused Wrote: Nature is always so amazing, GW. It is also awe-inspiring to think that we too are part of her.

I think it's amazing that I am ONE with the Universe.


RE: The mysterious nature of time - sunnysideup - 11-20-2014

(11-20-2014, 12:49 PM)Confused Wrote: Nature is always so amazing, GW. It is also awe-inspiring to think that we too are part of her.

I totally agree with you, Confused. Let nature speak and reveal its secrets.


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Parsons - 11-20-2014

(11-20-2014, 12:22 PM)Confused Wrote: The biggest organism in the world?

Oh, lemme guess before I click the link! Hondo the forest in Utah, if I remember the name and location correctly. BigSmile

Bleh... Well I was thinking of 'Pando'. It is a grove of aspen trees in Utah that has been determined to be all one organism. It is the heaviest and oldest known living organism on the Earth. So I guess it depends what you would consider to be "largest". I would argue Pando is larger since its heavier.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_%28tree%29


RE: The mysterious nature of time - sunnysideup - 11-20-2014

I think they are talking about the total length of the mycelia of that fungus. "#DidYouKnow one piece of mycelium the size of a watch battery and the weight of a housefly can produce a gallon of mycelium, which in turn can produce about 280,000 pounds of mushrooms?" That's pretty impressive, because in this case we are talking about 2.4 miles of mycelia.


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-20-2014

(11-20-2014, 08:32 PM)Parsons Wrote: I would argue Pando is larger since its heavier.

That brought a chuckle BigSmile

(11-20-2014, 01:06 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Confused, most of the time you are in such a good mood.

Trust me -- that is not even close to an iota of truth.

But we can all try, of course Smile


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-21-2014

Skeleton of the universe


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-21-2014

Something New On The Illusion Of Time


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-21-2014

Proof that we see what we believe


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-21-2014

Brain treats rejection like physical pain say scientists


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-22-2014

The hottest part of earth's crust


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-23-2014

Matter Could Be The Result Of Splitting Or Joining Of Strings?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-23-2014

Would Astronauts Survive an Interstellar Trip Through a Wormhole?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-23-2014

What Is Dark Energy?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-23-2014

Quantum Vibrations in Brain Opens 'Pandora's Box' of Theories of Consciousness


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-24-2014

Biology of Consciousness: Bridging the Mind-Body Gap?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-24-2014

Seven habits of resilience


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-24-2014

How Did Brains Evolve?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-24-2014

Five Ways Living Mindfully Can Help You Reach Your Goals


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

Seat of selflessness?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

How Smart Are Plants?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

The Brainwave That Lets You Recognize What’s New in the World


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

Why Do Volcanic Eruptions Come in Clusters?


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

Earth vs. Sun: Flipping Magnetic Face Off


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

Giant spot on the Sun


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Parsons - 11-25-2014

(11-25-2014, 09:24 PM)Confused Wrote: Giant spot on the Sun

Very interesting... I did not realize many of the conclusions / questions posed in this article. I did not realize that was the 2003 sunspots were the ones that produced that massive solar flare. It is quite interesting this sunspot produced a plethora of flares, but only one CME. It highlights how little we know about the behavior of the Sol.

I had very recently read about the Halloween Solar Storm of 2003 during Solar Cycle 23 in which an X45 (!!!!) class flare was recorded. I also remember when I read about the sunspot in question (AR2192) was about to surpass the two large sunspots back in 2003.


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-25-2014

The Four Pillars of Purpose


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-26-2014

Pixels of the universe


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-26-2014

Our universe is a hologram, and we’re floating inside of it, suggests new research


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-26-2014

(11-25-2014, 10:07 PM)Parsons Wrote: Very interesting... I did not realize many of the conclusions / questions posed in this article. I did not realize that was the 2003 sunspots were the ones that produced that massive solar flare. It is quite interesting this sunspot produced a plethora of flares, but only one CME. It highlights how little we know about the behavior of the Sol.

I had very recently read about the Halloween Solar Storm of 2003 during Solar Cycle 23 in which an X45 (!!!!) class flare was recorded. I also remember when I read about the sunspot in question (AR2192) was about to surpass the two large sunspots back in 2003.

Hello Parsons. Apologies for the delay in reply.

It looks like you deal with these things at a much more serious level. I am more of a dilettante. That is why I wanted to research on what you said before addressing your remarks. While researching, I found this. You may find it interesting --

Ionospheric situational awareness


RE: The mysterious nature of time - Confused - 11-26-2014

Sunspot is Back and Worse than Ever